passive dishonesty, Reivew on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Passive dishonesty - "Transformers 2" is an example, I personally think that this is really a dishonest movie, using the name of Transformers to deceive me into the cinema, but the one that impressed me the most was the American military C-17, RQ-4A, F-18, SR-71, M1A2, B-1, DDX... Just think of how my great childhood idol, Hercules, was smashed by a U.S. railgun in one shot. I was in pain. But in this regard, I think the director and the producer are relatively innocent. Originally, they managed to attract the sponsorship of the US military and authorize them to use the latest equipment of the US military, but I did not expect that the military personnel would dominate the audience-the US military is more deformed in the film. The King Kongs are even more brilliant, and the crew is difficult to ride a tiger. It seems that the barrel of the gun is not only the regime, but also the appearance rate. Therefore, the more frank name of this film should be "Let's see how the US military saves the world". If it is the name, I can say that this film is to the point and expensive to render the U.S. military's global rapid strike capability to the fullest, earning enough face for the struggling soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.

View more about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen reviews

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen pictures