Of course, the most important main line is Destruction King and Cloud Mud. Some people say that this setting is not the same as Despicable Me? In fact, the character analysis is very different. Despicable Me is a real villain who is influenced by three kind girls to abandon evil and become good. And the Invincible Destruction King plays the bad guy—a thankless job, and he doesn't get the attention he deserves and begins to question the value of his work. From the point of view of value neglect, it is like living garbage workers who are not given the respect they deserve, but they are essential. And Yun Ni is even more different from the three sisters in the despicable me. She is essentially a tomboy who loves racing cars. When she first sees the Wrecking King, it is not like other little girls who are afraid to call him a buddy and pretend to be mature. The power is infinite, but it is actually very naive in nature. In order to win the love of others, it is foolish to win a medal. The character just matches the cloud and mud, so that they will naturally become best friends.
Yunmu's setting is a racer in sugar rush who is persecuted as a "system bug", but I think she's really a system bug. This setting might be better. Because this complements the "invisible man" setting among friends like Destruction King. In the end, the two people realized their worth through the process of getting to know each other. Just like how the two main characters in How to Train Your Dragon Hiccup are the loser in the family and Toothless is also flawed. But obviously the screenwriter wants to make the final battle with the big villain, so this naturally becomes a foreshadowing.
The strange love between coach Sue and Kuaishou Axiu is very embarrassing, and they played love in Nestle Quicksand. . . . There are also many such jokes in the film. Kuaishou Axiu wanted to learn from the King of Destruction to hammer the prison railings but made them thicker; and the scene of King of Destruction and Cloud Mud making a racing car was also the most laughable in the audience.
In short, this is an animation with a beginning and an end, a rich and compact plot, a full-view picture, and a little depth. If compared with Madagascar 3, it is stronger than the latter, because the plot of Motor 3 is somewhat sparse. But it is incomparable to a masterpiece like Wall-E. I think it is a masterpiece on the same level as How to Train Your Dragon.
View more about Wreck-It Ralph reviews