First of all, I have to say that I like Daniel Craig's 007 the most. Maybe as a person born in 1990, Brosnan will feel a little old-fashioned, but it is because he knew and fell in love with 007 that he died at another day. Since then, every 007 domestic The first day of the show will be spent in the cinema. After the release of Casino Royale in 2007, I was completely fascinated by 007 played by Craig. I still clearly remember that Casino Royale expressed the tough style of the new 007 in just a few shots at the beginning. It really worked, and everyone accepted it from the beginning. For the new 007, it always feels unfair to compare Spectre to Casino Royale. The story of the casino is very clear, and it brings the story to a climax step by step. The Bond set by the casino is an ordinary agent who will be injured and fail. He will do some intelligence work and solve some key enemy figures. reality! reality! Still true! Although the subsequent Quantum of Solace is worse, the story is bland but the true style and tight rhythm are still retained. When I saw the Sky Crisis in 2013, I felt the change in the overall style and the 007 series became more and more gorgeous and the story pattern was enlarged. The plot was not compact and the connection was abrupt. Now the situation is getting bigger and bigger, and it is estimated that in the future, it will be necessary to save the world. Can't just make a traditional and realistic 007, don't the director feel bored after watching too many films with one enemy and a hundred?
Digressing, I watched Spectre, and it was pretty dull from the beginning. 007's iconic title animation related to the whole plot couldn't be done well. The octopus at the beginning thought it was a horror movie this time, and then the lines began to be literary and artistic. Fan, I didn't understand anyway. In the middle part of the drag racing scene, the rhythm is really slow enough, there is a kind of slow motion feeling, I always feel that the car is running at 30 miles, the villain boss is the most worth mentioning, it is really weak, as the final boss related to the four movies is not yet in the casino The Rachev is domineering, has a lot of words and has little to do with the plot (if there is so much nonsense time to send more thugs), I personally think it is just to avenge the revenge for being neglected when I was a child. The plot of the ruins of MI6 in the back can only be described by old wine and broken bottles. Not much to say about the flaws. On the positive side, Bond is still the same Bond, sharp, calm, and agile. The new Dr. Q's acting skills are good, and M also rushed to the front line this time.
In short, 007 has not changed, and the script has too many flaws. It should be Daniel Craig's last 007, I really miss him. Now my preference for movies is still in the traditional and real movies like The Godfather and Casino Royale, and I still like the real and ordinary Bond.
Anyway, as probably Daniel Craig's last 007, it's worth a look
View more about
Spectre reviews
