Remove the physics part and the story is completely true

Delmer 2022-04-22 07:01:03

If all the anti-entropy, anti-time, forward and reverse forces, etc. of this film are deleted, the story of this film is completely established, just like moving Star Wars back to ancient Rome, it is also completely established.

However, the basic story of the film is also so old-fashioned and boring. The crazy boss wants to destroy the world, elite agents are dispatched, and the breakthrough is the boss's woman. . . Wait, is this 007? Yes, this can be regarded as a 007 movie with some theoretical physics knowledge that ordinary people can't understand.

I think that if a movie wants to burn the brain, it should be the story itself that burns the brain, and the story makes people wonder, not a simple comparison of the story, which is filled with some dangling physical concepts. After all, not everyone has MIT. Bachelor of Science.

I don't watch many movies, so I won't take many comparative examples. Just take one---"12 Monkeys", this movie is also related to time travel, (of course, the creed is against the current, not the shuttle), and destiny. But this movie is the story itself that is more thought-provoking, thought-provoking and addictive. You don't have to think about the story of the creed, it's just a good 007 agent film, and then a bunch of physical theories are added to it. Even the details are similar. First, the protagonist Shabi handed over the deadly weapon to the villain, the world was about to be destroyed, and then the Jedi turned over to save the world. Of course, we also need to add the plot where the male protagonist of the agent falls in love with the female protagonist.

A really good movie should be the organic integration of various elements and interdependence, rather than being able to be broken apart at will and irrelevant. A really good movie should tell a good story, not an open class in physics or an unproven hypothetical theory. 12 The monkey moved me. Also watched it three times. creed? I'm not interested in second brushing, nor am I interested in understanding the inverse entropy theory that 99% of the people in the world don't understand. forget it.

View more about Tenet reviews

Extended Reading
  • Dominic 2022-03-25 09:01:05

    ? How can this continue to blow? Just like to admit that I have a low IQ instead of thinking that Nolan’s narrative is really problematic? I watched the whole process inexplicably, a bunch of tall terms stuck on my face, one sentence was too late to digest, and the next sentence followed. The game upgrades and clearance tasks are the same as the scenes and locations. The final battle is really watching. I'm impatient. I keep repeating the meaningless fighting scenes, and a bunch of people walking backwards like convulsions. For a long period of time, these scenes have no effect on the narrative except for being cool and dragging. Such a movie will neither make me feel "good" right now, nor will I have the desire to have aftertaste after watching it. During the process, I watch the watch almost every half an hour, and once in the last five minutes. I really did my best to leave halfway...

  • Kaia 2022-03-25 09:01:05

    2.5 / On the way home, I asked myself three questions: ① In the 150 minutes, besides the five parties, is there any scene worth remembering or any moment of power revealed? The answer is no, so add one star for the five parties. ②Will playing an ugly action scene look better when played backwards? The answer is still not good-looking boots. ③Nolan believes it or not, "Don't try to understand it, feel it"? I think he believed it when he licked the CP of the two male protagonists at the last moment. I use almost every minute to tell you: how bad my director ability is, how my audiovisual and text are out of touch, how my narrative has no sense of rhythm, how my characters are dry and cool, and how my concept can only be The most mechanical way to advance the deployment. The whole film is: catch, pull, see, elbow, four characters.

Tenet quotes

  • The Protagonist: To do what I do, I need some idea of the threat we face.

    Barbara: As I understand it, we're trying to prevent World War III.

    The Protagonist: I'm not seeing Armageddon here. Nuclear holocaust?

    Barbara: No. Something worse.

  • Andrei Sator: How would you like to die?

    The Protagonist: Old.

    Andrei Sator: You chose the wrong profession.