Knowing Escher's should not be difficult to understand "Creed", this film just moved Escher's painting from space to time. The timeline inside the movie is actually equivalent to an open book, crossing the spine from the left to the right, and when someone crosses back, it is equivalent to closing the book, and the spine passes through the converter At a moment, one's past and future are at the midpoint, and precise gears begin to engage. Of course, the plot of the movie leads to countless "books" in the dolls, and it is more difficult to sort out. Generally speaking, it is not difficult to understand this logic, but it is not easy to shoot.
The protagonist has asked the questions that the film may face, "What about the law of causality?" The many worlds theory mentioned by the real male protagonist, the copper coin pendant, seems to be inexplicable. Because if we understand time as an extended dimension like space, then the entire story of the film will fit together as a whole, unable to move a single bit. This is indeed like the last line of the little brother, which is a bit "fateful", and this precise structure really makes people think of its "designer".
There are actually bugs that the movie can't solve, the so-called "grandfather paradox". For example, when the Russian took his wife as a hostage and threatened the protagonist to tell the whereabouts of the box, he asked the question in reverse, got the answer, and then went back to the past to ask the question in normal chronological order (relative to himself), then in fact Before he asked, he already got the answer. And to get answers, you have to ask questions. This constitutes a paradox. Just like a person who invented a time machine based on some data, traveled back to the past and gave those data to his past self so that he could invent a time machine in the future, then we can’t help but ask, where does the “data itself” come from come? Therefore, this film can only be felt, and cannot be explained by realistic theories.
There are also injuries. For example, if two identical people appear at the same time, one of them must be "reversed". According to the setting of the film, they should not be able to breathe directly. In the last scene, both British women are breathing directly. Of course, if people put it backwards for a long enough time, and then put it backwards again, maybe they can exist in positive order at the same time, but then it seems that a copy of the same positive particles will appear, which is not conserved. Maybe I understand wrong.
In short, it's still worth watching, don't feel that you don't understand it, at least it's still a bit more difficult for me as a professional course.
View more about Tenet reviews
