I really don't know how to rate it, but I can say that I feel good. Nolan really likes the ring structure. The details that you didn't understand or even ignored in the previous film will appear again and play a role later. This has been in his first movie. It started, but this time, the entire movie was directly turned into a ring, and a setting was made to turn the time into a ring, and then it was used in the symmetrical time points in the film. . I thought about dividing the film into two halves and starting from the middle, maybe the plot and characters are the same. Let's just make a movie with Anderson one day and see who can drive the audience crazy first and then talk about the plot. Compared with the previous Nolan movies, this plot is really not that good. The third world war is about to break out again, and the agents have to sacrifice themselves to save the world. Although I don’t understand who and why they want to destroy the world after reading it, this Oppenheimer has seen two episodes of Harry Po. Tetsu wouldn't split that thing into nine parts and hide them separately. . And there are almost no emotional lines. The characters in it are like tool people who have been programmed just to complete these ring structures. It is difficult for me to enter the movie to talk about this setting. At least I think it is quite cool. The show is amazing, but the truth is that no one (at least I don't) wants to take three more calculus classes after dinner on a Saturday night. If you can keep up with the first half, the next hour is like you can't finish today's class, and then quickly pass the knowledge to your teacher. There are many ways to take the same course, and the same is true for movies. Nolan may have a good shot himself, but the evaluation from Teacher Cha may not be very good.
View more about Tenet reviews
