Creed, in fact, this story is not difficult to understand, the core sentence is clear, that is, a person is going to save a world threatened by "reverse".
But explaining how this reverse is threatening the world gets complicated.
First of all, the protagonist's appearance comes from a terrorist attack. The protagonist mixed in with the police who rescued the hostages to find the real target of the attack, an important person in a white shirt, (the important thing is that he is still something he wants to hide)
The male protagonist quickly found the important people, and then found the important things he hid in the backstage. Then, he found that the robbers planned to destroy the theater, and all the hostages might be killed, so he did not escape immediately, he just He went to defuse the bomb, but time was running out. Another operator saved his life and escaped from the theater in time. He didn't see the face of the person who rescued him, but only remembered that there was a mark on the person's backpack.
Then he came out because the epaulette on his body fell off, and he was recognized as not the policeman, and was arrested.
(The confusion here comes from the fact that the protagonist, the robbers, the police and their clothes are basically the same, mainly black, which leads to confusion, who is who? This also creates suspense, who is the one who saves the protagonist? Who.)
When he woke up again, he found himself on the railway in the suburbs, tied by himself, his companion had been beaten into a coma, those who threatened him continued to threaten him, and he would rather kill himself than betray his friends. He passed the test and became Anonymous, and then he joined an organization whose purpose was beyond nationalism and his efforts to save the whole world. He needs to follow the TENET and has a symmetrical gesture.
Then he worked out, lived on a boat, then he mixed in with the crowd and went to a place like a science laboratory, where he foresaw the scientists, who told him that they were threatened by the future, and this weapon made Time is reversible, but what kind of damage can time reversibility cause? Not sure, but they want to stop the emergence of this weapon, and he went to find the source of the weapon for this.
According to the composition of the weapons, he located a rich man in India. The rich Indian told them that the weapons he sold to them were normal, and it was through a Russian arms dealer that their weapons became abnormal. Therefore, the Russian arms dealer is the crux of the problem, and the male protagonist needs to find out the reason.
The male protagonist finds the arms dealer's wife through a middleman. The arms dealer's wife is in the process of getting a divorce. There are two reasons for the divorce. One is that the wife cannot get custody of the son after the divorce, and the other is that the woman sold a fake pair before. Draw it to her husband, who threatens to send her to jail.
The male protagonist can help destroy the painting, but at the cost of seeing his husband.
In fact, it starts to go outrageous here. This woman's departure from her husband is basically a complete set of dog blood, but does this have anything to do with the male protagonist? The male protagonist gave this woman a chance to find out that she could still leave her husband?
Well, then the woman introduced the man into their social circle, and told them about the offshore art market, which includes money laundering and low-level bank transactions, and these artworks were placed in the airport's bonded warehouse. But the question at this time is, are they going to explore the secrets in this bonded warehouse, or are they going to destroy those paintings?
The motivation here is confusing.
What are they looking for? (There is a strong motivation problem here)
Then they created a gorgeous visual spectacle of destroying the bonded warehouse with a large plane. Then, they found two men in black, and then hit the protagonist and Neil respectively, one of which was reversed.
After the failure of the operation, they went to the Indian arms dealer again, and the arms dealer asked them to find plutonium-241.
The protagonist went to the Russian arms dealer again, the Russian, thinking that the male protagonist had an affair with the female protagonist, so threatened to kill him, but the male protagonist told him a message that shocked him, and then he asked the male protagonist the next morning Go sailing together.
Then in the process of sailing, the hostess took the opportunity to send the safety rope of the Russian businessman and let him fall into the water. At this time, the man came to the Russian, so he owed the man a favor.
...the above are all plots and reviews, but I really don't want to review them here.
In fact, the sorting out of the plot makes people feel too complicated and tedious. According to the director's logic, the film is actually carried out according to the chronological order of the protagonists, but at this time, the chronological order we know is no longer a linear vector, but a Reversible, states that can exist at the same time.
This is difficult to understand from the perspective of three-dimensional or thinking space, but it can be understood with a little understanding of the basic assumptions of quantum physics and the deduction of various hypotheses.
Because the space we live in is a three-dimensional space, or adding the vector of time, we live in a four-dimensional space. Therefore, we cannot understand the higher-dimensional space only by relying on this simple cognitive concept, but not understanding does not prove that this spatial structure does not exist.
More simply, within our space, our knowledge of time is a single, irreversible quantity. Just like looking at three-dimensional space from two-dimensional space, we cannot understand the concept of "high", but if we look at time in high-dimensional space again, then time is no longer a linear vector, and its properties may change. That is, the basic problem of Schrödinger's cat. In this space, there are "past" and "future" at the same time. This is the assumption that the cat is dead and alive.
The whole movie is actually describing this kind of chaotic state. From the perspective of the protagonist, his time is advancing all the time, but in fact, the space where he exists is the state of past, present and future, which exist at the same time.
The whole movie is also describing such a state.
What is described in this film can be said to be a classical hypothesis of quantum physics, but he did not explore the consequences of such an existence. He just used a subjective vision to tell some visual wonders , In fact, it doesn't matter who saved who, who led who, it's just a tool for him to present the chaos world he knows.
But he is too weak as a part of humanistic care.
What if I knew that I could be in the past at the same time, but what about the present and the future?
In this regard, there are the old "Back to the Future" trilogy, and the recent excellent low-budget sci-fi films "The Night When the Comet Came" and "Back to the Future" discuss the grandfather paradox problem.
The Night of the Comet explores the multiverse hypothesis. And the night when the comet came, the details and the characters were all in place.
Nolan seemed to sink into the discussion of space in physics, and he gave up the torture of human nature. In other words, he seems to have given up the exploration of human subjectivity, although on the cosmic scale, human beings are no different and nothing special.
But such technical expressions seem to become hollow and tedious. He just showed ordinary people the physics knowledge that ordinary people don't know, and did not bring new exploration or his own thinking.
The reason why he thinks "Inception" is good is that he asked a philosophical motif. After all, how to distinguish between dream and reality. This question is very real.
In fact, from the beginning of "Interstellar", Nolan began to have a strong interest in space. But then humans become less important relative to space.
Similar, the heaven and earth are ruthless, and all things are dogs, but is Nolan heaven and earth?
Besides the visual spectacle, what else is left of the movie?
At this time, we have to go back to the famous saying of the Three-Body Problem, giving civilization to the years, not civilization. What is the meaning of the existence of life to space? I think that's what the movie lacks.
View more about Tenet reviews
