I have always resisted popular reading, and I don't read the popular <
>, <>, <> at all. But then again, if you don't know them or what they are about, Lost the qualification to criticize them, lost the right to speak. People who haven't read the Bible can only talk about the Bible in vain.
I have a book of <>, which has just hit the market when I bought it, and it has not yet caused a hot market trend. I bought it for two reasons: First, I was an art major, and was aroused by the name; second, my mother loved to read detective and mystery novels. I haven't watched it since I bought it, but my parents have watched it. After it became popular, I didn't want to watch it.
I couldn't sleep last night. I first watched "The Sins of Father Amaro". I didn't feel sleepy after watching it, and I didn't have any other discs to watch. I accidentally saw the < that my father bought next to the TV. >. Well, should make me sleepy. Put it in the DVD player (heaven, it's still a gun, dubbed in Chinese, fainted)
as I expected, <> is a book that covers a little bit of semiotics, a bit of cryptography, and a bit of history Hollywood-style entertainment blockbuster with religious knowledge (let's call it that), not even a thriller. The crux of the film is actually just an assumption: Mary Magdalene was pregnant and gave birth before Jesus died. There are indeed some scholars of religious scholarship who believe that Mary Magdalene was closely related to Jesus, but the concept of pregnancy and childbirth is ultimately the author's assumption. Assumptions are not a problem, art needs fiction. The author's assumption is actually of the same nature as those of my country's Qing palace dramas, that is, for the sake of entertainment, he racks his brains to rearrange the relationship between the characters and subvert the well-known official history. From this point of view, it is a very postmodern film.
The semiotics and cryptography in it are so superficial that anyone who has read two pages of Saussure or Anchor will find it amusing. I can only deceive the girls who are dizzy by "rose" and "holy grail" by pretending to be mysterious.
The relationship between the characters is so simple. From the time Miss Amelie (used to call it this way, huh) said she didn't believe in Christ and saw her speaking Sangreal in French, the discerning person didn't have to watch it any more. There was only one woman in the whole film, and the two old men said desperately there The Holy Grail is a symbol of women or something, it's strange if you can't see it. The ending is even more vulgar. A noble family is reunited and has no eyes to see.
The Catholic Church in Hebei Province issued a statement saying boycott of <>, which I personally think is not a joke. Pop culture has a deep impact on us, and maybe a child will really believe it after reading it (it is not impossible for adults). Jesus and Sakyamuni are human beings and gods are not important in our age of faith crisis. What matters are the teachings of Catholicism, Christianity and Buddhism. Believing in religion is not really "believers are saved", if your purpose is to keep yourself safe and make a fortune as soon as possible, if you just believe that worshiping Jesus or Bodhisattva will let you pass the exam when you fail your homework, if you don't study every Do not meditate on the teachings of religions. I advise you to be a petty bourgeois believer as soon as possible. Go to Starbucks for coffee!
View more about
The Da Vinci Code reviews
