I found a question, why are American blockbusters always disaster films? The previous zombies, natural disasters, etc., this time it is the flu, 90% of the world has died, and human civilization has regressed. It seems that the thoughts conveyed are all pessimistic emotions that there is no future and that there will be a disaster tomorrow. If you watch too many movies, can it have any positive effect on people? Of course, every time there are American heroic figures who lead everyone out of the predicament, but is the real American predicament a natural disaster? Well, no politics here.
There is a point in the movie that is very touching. Human technology is more and more developed. In the past, there was no electricity, then computers, and now the Internet. It is more and more convenient for us to receive information and enjoy services, but in fact, the things we rely on are more and more. More and more, as in the movie, a sudden change, without the ability to generate electricity, the so-called civilized life of mankind seems to have completely collapsed. This is worth thinking about. The irony is that I, who wrote such words, still need electricity, computers, and the Internet to convey my thoughts.
There is a scene in the movie where the city finally has electricity, and the human leader's iPad can be fully charged, so that he can see the photo of himself and his family from the iPad, what a miserable picture. But if we think about it again, how many of us will foolishly spend money to develop film photos? The idea of "an electronic version is enough" has been deeply rooted in everyone's mind. After all, sending electronic photos to It is convenient and economical to enter the mobile phone, but have you ever thought about what to do if the mobile phone is out of power?
Back to this movie about survival and coexistence. Humans need the power station where the orangutans live to generate electricity. If everyone can agree, this is a win-win solution. Orangutans have a natural survival advantage. Humans have a long history of technological and cultural heritage, especially in armed equipment. If everyone lives in peace, in fact, the more profitable will be the orangutans, because through learning, the overall cultural level of the tribe can be improved. The enlightenment and enlightenment effect of this time, and your own strong physique, is something that human beings cannot learn. Some people say that, as the one-eyed orangutan said, humans are weak now, and if you help them repeat civilization, it will only be a disaster for the orangutan in the future. Personally, I think this is just a way to escape the problem. If you refuse to cooperate, human beings can always find other ways to recover. It is only a matter of time. But if you refuse, you are doomed to live in the forest forever and be an orangutan.
However, when it comes to survival, whether it is a human or a gorilla, it will be selfish. After the human leader knew about the orangutan group, the first thing they did was to eliminate the potential threat and then get the resources; but in the orangutan, the one-eyed orangutan found that humans had so many weapons, which could destroy the danger of the orangutan, so they directly initiated the orangutan. The internal coup then provokes a war between orangutans and humans. As a visionary gorilla leader and maintenance staff, I can only regret. That's right, no matter who is right or who is wrong, war is inevitable. In the final analysis, it can only be said that it is a matter of survival of each race, whether it is inferior or inferior, always, the factor of doubt exists in our DNA. Coexistence can only be developed when my existence is not threatened. Facing the issue of human survival, as a human being, can you choose to coexist?
View more about Dawn of the Planet of the Apes reviews
