The overall rhythm is good. It’s still very impressive to pick out the part that describes the revolution alone. Samsung puts it all here. But as long as it is added to Katniss's plot, it will be awkward, and I will not give one star.
Although the heroine is unwilling to become a pawn of the rebel army, it is difficult to let go of her concern for Peeta, but she also opposes and even hates the tyranny of the capital, so she can only become an incomplete revolutionary and be led by the nose. Even though the people around her repeatedly emphasized that she should show her true self, and even sent her to the battlefield, she was acting from beginning to end. No matter how righteous and resolute she is in front of the camera, she can't hide the imitation and pain in her heart.
This is a good way to deal with it, and it is beneficial to three-dimensional characters and show the inner contradictions of characters. But the way the film is handled is unbelievable. The so-called act of the heroine who wants to show self-consciousness seems irrational and even naive to others, and her concern for Peeta could have been a more reasonable motive, but because of the existence of Hammer, she has The characteristics of the scumbag are vividly displayed. Perhaps the setting of these plots is to show the inner struggle of the heroine and thus reflect her growth, but the relatively rough handling of the film has successfully shaped the heroine into a negative character who is withdrawn, swaying, and has two boats. The image, in stark contrast to her slick Mockingjay image on the screen, is really embarrassing to look at.
Some people may say that the heroine is just a teenage child, and anyone else will do this, but since she has become a "leader" of the revolution, people will naturally apply the standard of the so-called "leader" to her unconsciously. Instead of treating her like an ordinary teenager, so did the audience. Could it be that the revolutionary figure we were expecting was a rebellious child? The first half of the film has successfully aroused the audience's hatred of the capital. When we wanted to see a vigorous revolutionary war broke out, the film repeatedly stayed on the heroine's "rebellious farce", and there was no climax in the end.
What the audience feels is not the difficulty of the revolution, but the "difficulty" of the heroine. Don't act again. Really, we can't watch it anymore. Let me ask such a mocking bird, who will not be disappointed by watching it? Who doesn't look embarrassed?
What's more, the second part spent a lot of time telling about the growth of the heroine. When she shot that arrow into the sky, she had grown into a real revolutionary fighter. How could she have returned to her original shape in the third part and became a real revolutionary fighter. A rebellious child, an ornamental bird who can only act. This is good, the second part is equivalent to a white shoot.
Another flaw in the film is that the war between District 13 and the capital made the two sides mock each other by making stars and brushing traffic. Is this still a way to hack the system? While fighting and revolutionizing, can you become an internet celebrity while acting? When the Mockingjay video was released, I felt embarrassed for my eldest cousin. Putting youth love and revolutionary war together, and the director didn't handle it well, the sense of disobedience was too strong. I can't help but wonder, is the heroine acting, or is the whole revolution a farce?
View more about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 reviews
