The first part created the entire series, with a main line of plot, focusing on the pure "Hunger Games" itself, which is exciting and exciting, but the national background that comes with it can also be regarded as a foreshadowing of the political war that follows. The second part follows the previous one, with reasonable logic and a reversed ending, with two main lines, one is the "Hunger Games" itself, and the other is an introduction to the political war behind the game. Its length is reduced compared to the first part, but it is also enjoyable to watch. It is conceivable that the following plots are definitely depicting the protagonist’s micro-perspectives under the macro background of political rebellion and war, but this third film is really average, the plot is chaotic. If you want to watch the Hunger Games, forget it. There are no Hunger Games, only political games. The problem The political struggle in reality is much more exciting than this. As the plot setting of the movie, it is more boring and sleepy to watch, and the emotional rendering is not enough to watch. The big cousin of the third subordinate finally shot and killed the president of the rebel army. Although it is reasonable, it is not conventional. It is a breakthrough. The next one also briefly discussed the winner of the political struggle. The above is regarded as the third part. highlights. Finally, congratulations to the male protagonist for turning his spare tire into a positive position. Although I think this male protagonist feels weak in the game, domestic violence is very powerful. And the eldest cousin is still very beautiful. When I watched "Space Traveler", I understood why Star-Lord wanted to be with the eldest cousin, because the eldest cousin is really good.
View more about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 reviews
