This has to talk about the foreshadowing and ending of the film. Most screenwriters and writers have a very serious weakness - anticlimactic, warlord rule is nothing more, they are still a waste trio, but fortunately lost to a hacker + smuggler in the end.
What? Hacker + Smuggler?
Even with the heroic aura of the protagonist looming over it, it shouldn't turn out like that. Why is Elysium's military defense capability so poor? In the eyes of the rich, the poor on earth are unlikely to make any military violations, or humanitarian, but the entire system is tampered with ownership by a few lines of code, isn't it too fragile?
Speaking of humanitarianism, Jodie Foster's stark characterization definitely deserves a 10.
Looking at the hero Matt Damon again, the image of a good man has not changed. This role also established the philosophical significance of Elysium. In the moment before his death, the meaning of the blissful space is infinitely enlarged. Maybe there is another world, there is no pain, no sadness, and some just save this world, the peace and tranquility of peace of mind is bliss.
Discussing philosophical elements in non-philosophical films requires another consideration under the premise that the film’s plot is extremely natural and rich. If you only look at the philosophical elements, you might as well buy a copy of Logic or Lao Tzu.
So what's so good about this movie?
After watching this film, what is imprinted in my memory is the life intelligence with highly bionic movements, super medical technology, and the blissful space that makes senior sci-fi fans bright enough. It is said that such a beautiful place, artificial atmosphere technology Really appreciate it.
As a sci-fi film, isn't that enough?
View more about Elysium reviews
