The plot is basically procrastination.
Military life is like this, and after watching this film, I believe it even more.
It is said that this is a documentary method. No, this is what a documentary looks like. The disadvantage of the documentary is that there is less narration, and the people watching are more lethargic.
Is it really necessary to take such a long shot to record a simple thing? The initial tension brought about by the bomb disposal theme was exhausted by repeated similar events and long, long takes.
What is the most important thing about a movie? Thought-provoking? reflect society? Enjoy the look and feel? Yes, these are all important, but more important than them, it must be seen first. You don't need to be like me, forcing yourself to learn to kill the Oscar winner of Avatar.
Is this really a total rubbish movie?
It's a pity I can't say that.
James took the satellite phone and called his family, but in the end said nothing. A silhouette of an American soldier in the setting sun, this is an impressive shot.
The white-collar worker who was about to be killed, wearing a suit, knelt helplessly on the ground, people were retreating one after another, and the camera, which was shaken for 0.5 seconds, looked up at the sky. It really took my breath away.
Towards the end, Sanborn says from the car, "No, I'm not ready to die." In that instant, the character really comes alive.
Soldiers are expected to be restrained and restrained. It is difficult to portray such a character. Throughout the text, James is a symbol of American heroism, risk-taking, single-handedness, strong ability, undisciplined for the sake of justice, and so on. Sanborn has always represented conservatism, following the rules, fulfilling their duties, and clearly dividing the labor. They must do their own things well, and they must not interfere in their own affairs. And Owen represents the small people of the public, who fears death, is a competent person in the past, and is most concerned about his own life and death of course.
But the details are gone. In the film of more than two hours, a total of three characters are not three-dimensional.
As for the connotation, I really don't really want to spend too much time talking about this.
Through the brutal description of the war, to exaggerate the anti-war sentiment. I think it's okay to do this in a tunnel war. Or, just about any movie about war would do it.
Describing war can be addicting. End to end. Speaking of this matter, the middle did not reflect at all. Cutting the head and tail off the film won't change anything. The monkey puts on the shoes and the hat, you are still a monkey, right? You want to match this shoe and hat, do the things in the middle really need to be adjusted?
This movie is really sad for Oscar.
In addition, it is interesting to add a piece of the plot of the base? Do you know if Bai Yangning in the army can bend or not?
I said,
let go of Sanborn
View more about The Hurt Locker reviews
