The whole time I watched the movie, I was totally outraged by such a worldview. What divides people into five factions, and what faction is more important than blood.
Everyone in that world will take some kind of personality test when they are about to come of age (is it?) to determine which faction is suitable or belong to, similar to some professional personality tests today. But to categorize people as erudite, fearless, selfless, friendly or honest is a misreading of human character. Who can be so single in character that can be so succinctly and rudely defined into a certain category? And such five factions are incompatible to some extent, and no one can belong to two factions at the same time. But we can look at the characteristics of these two factions - erudite, fearless, selfless, friendly and honest. As a person who is so-called useful to society, how can these five characteristics have only one of them. In the second stage of the heroine's training with the Dreadnought, she overcomes her fears by telling herself that none of this is true, which is the way the erudite does. But in order to survive, she can only do everything in her power to imitate what the Fearless did when faced with fear. I really don't understand what's so bad about having wisdom and courage at the same time. Of course in that world, this is done to maintain peace and order in society. However, human personality is so complex (in fact, the existence of personality may require a question mark), such a structure is bound to be unstable, and the so-called disagreements will only increase rather than decrease.
After the heroine found out that she was a disagreement, she chose the fearless faction. In the Fearless, the so-called bravery is daring to jump from a fast-moving train to the rooftop opposite, that is, even if you are beaten with blood in a fight, you cannot say a word to stop in order to save your life. At the beginning, the heroine chose to enter the fearless faction, perhaps because of the fearless faction, the kind of training that is associated with violent fighting to make a person loyal to a certain faction has a certain expressive tension and is more capable of Let the audience more intuitively feel the horror of being disloyal to the faction to which they belong in such a world. We can imagine what such a "training" would be like in other factions. For example, in the erudite faction, people's intelligence may be the object of training. If the intelligence score is at the bottom, people will also become homeless and homeless. faction. In this cruel process of "being integrated", I saw myself (began to substitute myself again _(:з"∠)_) because I was worried that I did not belong to the society recognized by the society, and I was worried that I was too different from the people around me , and he tried his best to make himself that person. So when the heroine sweated and bleed to survive in the fearless faction, I cried _(:з"∠)_(At the same time, I made up for the bullets that would float on the screen if I watched it at station B Curtain——The Burning of Mystery = = Enough to open your mind!!) I
heard that there is an original book, but because I am not very interested in this kind of subject matter, so I will not look for it. . I just want to say, if it were the original, the plot development should be much better. The rhythm gets messed up towards the end of the movie. . . The ending made me very dissatisfied! ! What does it mean that it's over! ! If that's the case, it's not just making a fuss, it's useful for such a stupid world! ! Well, it's over, but the movie is still worth watching _(:з"∠)_
View more about Divergent reviews
