The movie itself still has some positive meanings, but it seems too unbelievable that Sarah used her body to save men? If she treats the top ten cohabitants with a doctor's attitude, and doesn't involve feelings, it is said that cohabitants are basically not selected. If it is very ugly, wouldn't it be disgusting? And if you want to save, then the hypocritical and hateful deputy next to David seems to be more important to save. Why does Sara have only contempt for him?
Even so, she only saves those men who are "essentially good". But with the cohabitation method, it seems that those workaholic men as long as a beauty drags him to the beach to watch the beauty turn somersault, play with dogs, and so on, men will know the meaning of life and live life. good. Then what? I think what happened to the men who were cured by Sarah? It must have gone after women and dogs. How boring work is! In short, the overall design idea of this film is very problematic, this is a problem woman, right! She was already sick, it was a disease that was about to die, otherwise she would not have done such extreme things, even her family would not be able to bear it.
There is also Reeves. In all the movies, he is always out of his feelings. He always feels that his feelings are not on the heroine. The love he performs seems far-fetched. Who can tell me why? Was it his acting skills, or was it the idea that a female fan like me saw a handsome guy naturally "achieve his wish"?
Will Keanu Reeves love it?
View more about Sweet November reviews