Reporter's Responsibilities

Lea 2022-04-23 07:01:06

"Journalist means a person who collects, broadcasts, disseminates and comments on news and information about the events described."

The Declaration of the International Federation of Journalists on the Code of Conduct for
Journalists responsibility.

2. In the course of performing this duty, journalists shall at all times defend the principle of honesty, including the freedom of the press, the publication of the press, and the right to impartial judgment.

3. A reporter can only report on the facts that he or she knows about the source. Journalists must not suppress necessary information or tamper with documents.

4. Journalists have access to news, pictures and documents only through impartial means.

5. Journalists should use their best efforts to correct information that has been published but found to be materially inaccurate.

6. Journalists shall strictly observe professional confidentiality and protect news sources obtained in secret.

7. Journalists should be alert to the dangers of spreading prejudice through the media and should try to avoid conduct conducive to the spread of prejudice. These prejudices are intermingled with other matters and are often related to race, gender, sexual orientation, language, religion, political or other opinions, and national and social traditions.

8. Journalists should consider the following unemployed as serious professional faults: plagiarism; malicious misrepresentation; defamation; defamation; disinformation; baseless allegations; accepting bribes of any kind for the purpose of publishing or suppressing publication.

9. Those worthy of the title of journalist should consider it their duty to faithfully follow the above principles. Journalists should recognize the judicial power of their peers and exclude government or other interference to the extent permitted by the laws of each country.
(Adopted by the International Union of Journalists World Congress in 1654. Amended by the World Congress in 1986.)

This film, which won Best Picture and Best Original Screenplay at the 88th, will only be understood after watching it and how it differs from the other nominated films. It tells us what qualities a journalist should have. There is no mess of office chores in the film, all journalists are doing their job (finding the truth - confirming the truth - verifying the evidence)

and the news coverage in our country...

Thank you for this movie, let me know what the profession of a journalist has changed, thank you.

View more about Spotlight reviews

Extended Reading
  • Trudie 2022-03-23 09:01:09

    This film is better than the American drama "Newsroom". There is an illusion that conducting social news investigations in the U.S. has little resistance and is very simple. Check the information and interviews are completed. The reporters don’t need to shed blood and sacrifice. In the heavenly dynasty, social news reporters will give you the crime of prostitution at any time, and they will be phishing law enforcement at any time. , I will squat you in jail at any time, be beaten or killed at any time in revenge, not to mention anything else, please see what happened to some reporters and leaders at Southern Weekend.

  • Norene 2022-04-24 07:01:02

    Originally, choosing a famous investigative feature is a bonanza for film directors. The clear logic, detailed figures, vivid characters, and appropriate rhythm in the report are all about drawing a storyboard script directly for the screenwriter. However, this film is not based on the report of the "Boston Globe", but re-edited the work of the "Focus" investigation team in the nearly one year before the release of the blockbuster report. The rhythm is very enjoyable, hardly a breath

Spotlight quotes

  • Walter 'Robby' Robinson: You know thirteen priests in Boston who have molested children?

    Phil Saviano: Yeah! Why do you keep repeating everything I say?

    Walter 'Robby' Robinson: [quieter than before] I just like to clarify things.

    Phil Saviano: Maybe you should have clarified it five years ago when I sent you all of this stuff! It's all... right here!

    [silence, Phil composes himself]

    Phil Saviano: May I use your bathroom?

    [pause]

    Matt Carroll: Yeah, sure, Phil.

  • Mitchell Garabedian: Three years ago I get a call from an ex-priest, Anthony Benzovich. He was at Blessed Sacrament back in '62, and he saw Geoghan...

    [waits for two cops to pass by, then continues]

    Mitchell Garabedian: ... taking little boys up to the rectory bedroom. So he's appalled, all right? And tells the bishop about it. The bishop threatens to re-assign him... to South America.

    Mike Rezendes: Jesus.

    Mike Rezendes: Yeah. So, fast forward thirty-five years. Benzovich reads that Geoghan has been charged with molesting hundreds of kids. So, he feels guilty. He calls me.

    Mike Rezendes: So, you have testimony of a priest telling his superiors about Geoghan in '62?

    Mitchell Garabedian: [shakes his head] No, I do not. Because when I call Benzovich in to give a disposition, he comes in with a lawyer.

    Mike Rezendes: Wilson Rogers!

    Mitchell Garabedian: Right. And suddenly, Father Benzovich has a very foggy memory. Can't remember anything. He's useless. So, I go back to work, I forget about it, whatever. Until about a year ago, I find an article about a priest who warned church officials about Geoghan.

    Mike Rezendes: Benzovich went to the press?

    Mitchell Garabedian: Yeah. Local paper, Patriot-Ledger. Nobody saw it. But now I got Benzovich on record. So, I file a motion to depose Benzovich a second time. And Wilson Rogers, that smug son of a bitch, files a motion opposing my motion. And that's when I have him.

    Mike Rezendes: Have him how?

    Mitchell Garabedian: Rogers opposes my motion, so I have to make an argument as to why I'm allowed to depose Father Benzovich a second time. Okay? But this time, I'm allowed to attach exhibits. You follow what I'm saying?

    Mike Rezendes: The sealed documents?

    Mitchell Garabedian: Yes! I can attach the sealed documents that I've gotten in discovery, Mr. Rezendes, the same documents your paper is currently suing for.

    Mike Rezendes: You're shitting me!

    Mitchell Garabedian: What? No, no, I'm not shitting you! So, I pull out the fourteen most damning docs, and I attach them to my motion. And they prove everything. Everything! About the church, about the bishops, about Law...

    Mike Rezendes: And it's all public! Because your motion to oppose Rogers' motion...

    Mitchell Garabedian: ...is public, yeah. Exactly. Now you're paying attention.

    Mike Rezendes: So, I can just walk into that courtroom right now and get those documents?

    Mitchell Garabedian: No, you cannot. Because the documents are not there.

    Mike Rezendes: But you just said they're public.

    Mitchell Garabedian: I know I did. But this is Boston. And the church does not want them to be found. So, they are not there.