Heresy in the production system requires courage

Jeffery 2022-04-20 09:01:06

I first read the movie review of Muyu Shuixin, the main character of station B's up, and then because of this subject matter attracted me quite a bit - fighting against the dark side of the system. Since I was a child, I liked this kind of rebellion against authority, but the older I grew up, the more afraid I became. On the one hand, it is that things are less paranoid and less certain. On the other hand, I have been shaken by a belief I once held firmly, and I am reluctant to allow myself to believe in anything at all (maybe this is sad). This is too far, let's go back to this film. When I finished watching it, I felt that it still met my expectations.

Judging from the narrative style of the film, the director's performance is very "restrained", you will feel very dull, but this line drawing method can restore the story to the greatest extent, the narrative must be objective, and a good film is to leave the judgment to the audience. What it does is to tell the truth as much as possible and express the point of view as objectively as possible. This film does it without a doubt. First, since it is based on a true story, it is very similar in texture to a documentary. It focuses on the media people of the Globe newspaper, who spare no effort to find clues to expose the systematic sexual abuse that exists in the religious system. Secondly, at the end, there is no picture of the media people bringing the godfather to justice after the exposure, but with words instead. This kind of blank space is undoubtedly restrained, and everyone is happy to punish evil and promote good. Maybe the director's purpose is more than that, he wants to Triggers the audience to think and reflect calmly, in real life. Then, the emotional ups and downs of the characters in the film are not as big as imagined, and the contradictions and conflicts on the surface are not very large. Whether it was Robbie's confrontation with the church lobbyists or after finding out the truth, everyone's performance was "restrained" and very rational.

Thematically, the main line is to expose and confront the dark side of the system, which also involves sexual assault, beliefs, people within the system, and human nature. I want to pick out beliefs to talk about, calm down and think, although they expose the crimes of the church, are they trying to destroy religious beliefs? No, they just want to save faith. The church is an institution, formed by people, it will pass away, but faith is eternal, the church is built under a system of consent power, and when it becomes less obedient to people, then the people need to reform it , but it is often difficult for people in the system to push, everyone is groping in the dark, and suddenly the light is on, and they will face blame, so outsiders are needed to light the fire (like the new editor-in-chief).

Let’s talk about this first today, and I will have the opportunity to add it later.

View more about Spotlight reviews

Extended Reading
  • Lynn 2021-10-20 19:00:59

    Next year’s Oscars for Best Picture and Best Adapted Screenplay are the biggest hits, not only the three views are right, but the degree of completion of the film is also very high! The filming method of the film is very similar to this group of newsmen. It is objective, calm and rational, clean and not sensational. The script is a very traditional genre film narrative routine, which is both solid and practical. The team spirit of the crew is like a wonderful group performance without any The main creators grab the limelight, but they are powerful and awe-inspiring. ★★★★

  • Danielle 2022-03-25 09:01:05

    The more ugly cancer requires a calmer blade. A good journalist movie should resemble a good news report, without slandering, amplifying the shock value of the incident and the curious details, and leaving the anger and reflection on the audience and readers. Especially compared with Truth, another news release this year, it's really an opinionated one.

Spotlight quotes

  • Walter 'Robby' Robinson: You know thirteen priests in Boston who have molested children?

    Phil Saviano: Yeah! Why do you keep repeating everything I say?

    Walter 'Robby' Robinson: [quieter than before] I just like to clarify things.

    Phil Saviano: Maybe you should have clarified it five years ago when I sent you all of this stuff! It's all... right here!

    [silence, Phil composes himself]

    Phil Saviano: May I use your bathroom?

    [pause]

    Matt Carroll: Yeah, sure, Phil.

  • Mitchell Garabedian: Three years ago I get a call from an ex-priest, Anthony Benzovich. He was at Blessed Sacrament back in '62, and he saw Geoghan...

    [waits for two cops to pass by, then continues]

    Mitchell Garabedian: ... taking little boys up to the rectory bedroom. So he's appalled, all right? And tells the bishop about it. The bishop threatens to re-assign him... to South America.

    Mike Rezendes: Jesus.

    Mike Rezendes: Yeah. So, fast forward thirty-five years. Benzovich reads that Geoghan has been charged with molesting hundreds of kids. So, he feels guilty. He calls me.

    Mike Rezendes: So, you have testimony of a priest telling his superiors about Geoghan in '62?

    Mitchell Garabedian: [shakes his head] No, I do not. Because when I call Benzovich in to give a disposition, he comes in with a lawyer.

    Mike Rezendes: Wilson Rogers!

    Mitchell Garabedian: Right. And suddenly, Father Benzovich has a very foggy memory. Can't remember anything. He's useless. So, I go back to work, I forget about it, whatever. Until about a year ago, I find an article about a priest who warned church officials about Geoghan.

    Mike Rezendes: Benzovich went to the press?

    Mitchell Garabedian: Yeah. Local paper, Patriot-Ledger. Nobody saw it. But now I got Benzovich on record. So, I file a motion to depose Benzovich a second time. And Wilson Rogers, that smug son of a bitch, files a motion opposing my motion. And that's when I have him.

    Mike Rezendes: Have him how?

    Mitchell Garabedian: Rogers opposes my motion, so I have to make an argument as to why I'm allowed to depose Father Benzovich a second time. Okay? But this time, I'm allowed to attach exhibits. You follow what I'm saying?

    Mike Rezendes: The sealed documents?

    Mitchell Garabedian: Yes! I can attach the sealed documents that I've gotten in discovery, Mr. Rezendes, the same documents your paper is currently suing for.

    Mike Rezendes: You're shitting me!

    Mitchell Garabedian: What? No, no, I'm not shitting you! So, I pull out the fourteen most damning docs, and I attach them to my motion. And they prove everything. Everything! About the church, about the bishops, about Law...

    Mike Rezendes: And it's all public! Because your motion to oppose Rogers' motion...

    Mitchell Garabedian: ...is public, yeah. Exactly. Now you're paying attention.

    Mike Rezendes: So, I can just walk into that courtroom right now and get those documents?

    Mitchell Garabedian: No, you cannot. Because the documents are not there.

    Mike Rezendes: But you just said they're public.

    Mitchell Garabedian: I know I did. But this is Boston. And the church does not want them to be found. So, they are not there.