After watching the film, I revisited it carefully. The images that pop up most frequently in my mind are the scenes of those killed in battle, and the image of Brad Pitt sitting at the dining table reading a newspaper and drinking coffee(?).
In fact, this film does not have much to write about, or to feel the content of, this is a very standard war film. Different from the old and American politically correct "war films must promote anti-war ideas", the story described in this film is "there is a group of people who survived from the battlefield, went into the battlefield again, and finally died in battle". There are only a few emotions in this film. Whether it's a short-lived passion (it really can't be called love), or the emotions suppressed by Bupi, they all pass by in a flash. Perhaps this is the true face of war. The people involved have already turned into cold machines. When everything is going on, it is neither cruel nor sentimental. Death is just the abrupt end of the working machine. Only when the gunfire ceases do these war machines briefly revert to human form, mourning their dead comrades.
Brad Pitt's tough exterior has a soft heart, which is a natural expression of human nature, just like the German soldier of the "machine" Norman was spared at the end of the film, but I don't want to talk about it at all, because this is not the case. The focus of the movie. The theme of war is killing, and you are driving a tank and holding a machine gun to pour out hatred. "The ideal is peaceful, but history is violent." Perhaps the United States has been at war with foreign countries in recent years, and the result of the withdrawal of troops has been the breeding of terrorism. What I felt from this film was a little war mobilization. There is no reflection at the end, there is no postwar life, and the subtitle stage is a picture of Hitler. Did it immediately incite hatred? Are you also a hero? Come on, come and be a soldier in Great America!
View more about Fury reviews
