I guess in the end Norman will survive, because his identity is not one of Fury, but Fury's witness.
Art works narrate history. There are two perspectives. One is the big picture to describe the war and strategy, and the other is the perspective of the people in the war. Is there any grievance between the individual and the individual? It is obviously the first time I have seen it, no. But the individual cannot escape the collective interests.
The film left a goodwill to humanity. First, Norman's affection for Maya, and second, the German soldier's flashlight did not shine on Norman, who almost surrendered because of fear. It was also through Don's care for Norman and his care for the two German women that he shaped the people in the war, and he released his fears behind his comrades' backs, saying "I participated in this war to kill Germans from the very beginning. Africa to France, to Belgium, and now finally killing Germans in Germany. The war is almost over. But there are still a lot of people to die before that.”
Soldiers receive tasks and complete tasks until they lose their lives. It is a tool. At the beginning, there is conscience, but conscience cannot save lives. From killing the first person, from seeing the fleeting comrade who was just talking, anger and fear are intertwined, and there is only endless "F** in the mouth." K".
It is also a very interesting dialogue, the sir with a scar on his eye said "Why didn't they give up?", Don asked "Would you?". The answer is obvious. Soldiers in war are pawns and only move forward. If they become human, they will surrender.
View more about Fury reviews
