first half is "a superman wants to be a man" and the
second half is "a superman wants to find his roots.
" Setting:
When two superhumans are together, they will lose their superpowers and become mortals.
This setting has actually overturned our definition of superman.
Remember when the heroine said "We are the last couple"?
If we don't understand this sentence with conventional thinking, it means "there were many superhuman beings" (maybe aliens), when they are combined, they will become mortals, and they will be born, old, sick and dead; He was a superman, and then he chose to be a mortal on the road of evolution—birth, old age, sickness and death
. Yes, from the perspective of "very materialistic, scientific and rational", superman is a kind of YY, a kind of person who conquers nature and conquers the fragile body of human beings. YY
But if we see the look on Hancock's face when he scare away a woman who is throwing his arms away, we can't say that Superman's heart is stronger than
ours
To get back superpowers, on the contrary, is to say - superman is already in the past tense, and on the road of evolution, we finally chose mortals.
This makes people think of the last movie about Superman, no, not "Superman Returns" but "The Incredibles", to be exact, the beginning of "The Incredibles".
Complaining, disgusting, self-deprecating...
That sworn TV anchorwoman gritted her teeth and said the secret "You have some skills, but you can't fight the U.S. Constitution" It's
not so much the U.S. Constitution as the law of human society, or the society's Rule it.
We used to be superhumans, but we soon became very lonely, and we all ended up being human—living, getting old, sick, and dying.
Although there is a bit of a "nostalgia for contemporary" style, is there a more powerful humanistic concern than this?
View more about Hancock reviews
