The most unbearable thing is: after seeing a lot of literary youth here, they come to pick on the critics again, what is human tolerance, what is the original work and how is it, how is the camera lens bad, if this film deserves 3 stars, then by their standards , any large and small slices of domestically made cakes are fucking rubbish and only deserve 0 stars.
There are so many nonsense comments there. This film is a prequel to a past theatrical version. The plot said that what should be explained, what should be said, it has to be like "Inception", how did you arrange it like this? On a 50-year-old series? What kind of human inclusivity, what kind of philosophical thinking, oh my god, don't destroy your own numbers, brainless literary and youth, think too much and your brain will be broken. There are so many GRE logic problems in this commercial film that you need to do? When you take the entrance exam for top primary schools?
JJ is a good director. Although he has been reluctant to make progress lately, he has been making some sloppy films, but the bosses are very relieved to shoot for him. The good word-of-mouth box office is a testament. Unfortunately, some idiots have to give bad reviews to show that they are not interested in the history of Trek. He wrote it himself, he knew Klingon better than mother, and he was completely brainless.
View more about Star Trek Into Darkness reviews
