ZOE: I really liked this character at first. She is hard-working and smart, but also ambitious and clear-cut. It's just that as the plot develops, I think she's more of a greedy little smart than a smart bitch. It is said that she talks because she wants too much, and she seduced F first. There is no doubt about it, whether it is for her own pleasure or to please, people who get work and sex together are themselves stupid. Among her peers, he may be smart, but, in front of F, all smart fights have turned into small smarts. Naive and stupid.
DOUG: People who don't play much, loyal, not smart enough, but hardworking and capable. Some people may say it looks like a dog, but I think people who can find their own position are happier. Not greedy, calm and pragmatic. most of the time. I wish I could be like that too.
RUSSO: This character is also the one who made my favorability soar and then plummet. A drug addict, alcoholic and prostitute, he is not very glamorous in the parliament, but fortunately, he has a good appearance. His fatal flaws are emotional and extremely poor self-control. To tell the truth, anyone can fight with a mouth gun. He vowed to say that he was ready. When F wanted to defeat him, I was also considering whether there would be another possibility. He was not tempted, so maybe Binzhou still His, F's plans don't need to change either. From him, we can see our own shadow, sometimes sluggish, sometimes bloody, and his mentality fluctuates violently, and he can be defeated at any time without leaving a piece of armor. He is a warning sign for us, calm, calm, don't be so childish, maybe you will survive.
Those are the people worth writing about. I wanted to talk about CHRIS, because I also like her very much. She is smart and diligent, and the key is still beautiful. Rational beauty can add a lot of points.
To sum up, the strong must have several characteristics: rational, calm, smart (maybe not need a lot of smarts), diligent, ambitious, clear goals, and of course good looks are extra points. The traits of the underdog are also evident: ignorant, emotional, smug, wobbly—all signs of childishness.
I don't want to live the life of intrigue in the play. I don't think most ordinary people like this kind of life and work hard. After watching this drama alone, I have to reflect on myself, I seem to occupy all the characteristics of the weak. Early symptoms of a loser. Hopefully it's not too late to try to change.
It's a bit late to watch the first season now, after all, the fourth season is over. Just a little guess at the ending, F should not have the last laugh. After all, murder is not acceptable in any country, both morally and legally. This should be a thunderbolt that will be buried at the end.
The first time I wrote a drama review, I just wanted to remind myself not to become a loser.
View more about House of Cards reviews
