Compared with the comedy tone presented by the film, it is obviously inappropriate to label Nicholas's actions as upholding justice, and he will be scolded. And it is equally anachronistic to see the "watchmen" as the last force to defend tradition, and will suffer a brick. In such a movie with many jokes and constant spoofs, any slightly deeper analysis will make the critics suspect of pretending to be B. Therefore, we can only see the brave side of Nicholas, and cannot take into account the significance behind it to maintain the dignity of the law, uphold social justice, and fight against underworld forces; we can only see Nicholas' partner Danny being cautious, innocent, cute, confused and clumsy On the other hand, we cannot regard him as a rebel who has a clear view of good and evil, takes into account the overall situation, and reforms his past; we can only see the stubborn and conservative side of the “watchmen” with firm beliefs, and we cannot consider them to be the incarnation of a certain interest group. . In fact, too many spoof scenes in the film also seem to show that the producers did not want to burden the film with heavy social significance. What do you think it is, it is what it is. Literature and art must get rid of ideology and serve the public. In this regard, foreigners have always been better than us.
A small discovery: several shooting scenes in the movie have obvious John Woo style, and they raised their hands in agreement.
View more about Hot Fuzz reviews