1917

Gaetano 2022-03-23 09:01:09

[B] I really want to give it five stars, with the expectation of the best of the year, but I feel that it is so short of becoming a god. The emotional catharsis and explosion work in the third act is in place, but if the first two acts can be more desperate and depressed, the final effect will be even better. For movie fans, this film is already hard to pick. For ordinary viewers, it may be a bit disappointing (especially those who want fierce war scenes piled up and want war movies like "Saving Private Ryan"). Can't wait for Roger Diggins' next film.

Toney 2022-03-24 09:01:10

An image victory supported by industry. The scene scheduling almost exhausts the possibilities of viewpoints, and brings an unparalleled sense of immersion. The experience itself is meaning, like letting you witness the death of a person. The film avoids direct confrontation, and shows the war from the side of wreckage and ruins. This in turn highlights the cruelty of war. One detail is clear, it is said that the protagonist's hand was scratched by a barbed wire one second, and he tried to protect it, but the next second he inserted it into the body of the corpse. When you experience cruelty, the milk, falling petals, sudden songs, and running up the current are more like miracles. In a particularly favorite stroke, the protagonist is so exhausted that he can't restrain himself from immersing in the water, and then quickly coughs up the water. His success depends on instinctive will. PS: A literary and artistic work that achieves the ultimate in a concept is worth five stars.