The means by which these paparazzi obtain news are extremely despicable and disgusting. No one wants to do it, but they have always existed along with the development of normal news. This is a deformed existence of normal news reporting, and it is also like a thing The positive and negative sides are inseparable. The paparazzi news leaders make negative choices. As long as normal news exists, the paparazzi news will not disappear, because we need it, because we pay attention, because the people who buy paparazzi news are engaged in the positive side of normal news reporting. people. They need our attention. A paparazzi news---entertainment breaking news, crime scene restoration, traffic accident, etc. can attract our attention. As long as we---the curiosity of ordinary audiences, our attention to this kind of news will be limited. If it is higher than normal news, then newspapers and TV stations are willing to spend money to buy these exciting news materials, then paparazzi exist and are tenacious, or this kind of news will not disappear.
These news are like a spice of the press, the staple food is not them, but without them the staple food is boring. When we scold these paparazzi journalists for their abhorrent behavior, don't forget that the normal media broadcast the news for us, and if you want to broadcast these news materials, you need to pay these so-called paparazzi. We pay attention to this revelation, and we are happy that these media platforms have surged in traffic, and we are happy that paparazzi have considerable compensation. We realized that the behavior of the paparazzi is really shameful and immoral, so we turned on the troll mode to shoot at the paparazzi. We are happy that these media platforms, because of the surge in traffic, the paparazzi who are sad or have no feeling at all, because the money has already arrived, and There is no law on what price he should pay for it. From the beginning to the end, we ordinary audiences were led by the nose of these media platforms. They said there were leaks, so we swarmed to see it. They said that the paparazzi’s behavior was shameful, so we swarmed the paparazzi, and it was the media platforms and the paparazzi who profited. And we are just used salted fish.
So just asking paparazzi to abide by professional ethics is also immoral, they are also eating for the sake of eating, and they eat this bowl of rice because they are good at it. Only by truly improving the moral standards of the practitioners who broadcast news for us can we fundamentally eliminate the economic source of paparazzi.
Of course, if you retort that there are still people using these materials to threaten the parties, I can only say that the private use of materials for profit and the media's use of materials for profit are really two different things, and when the paparazzi do such things, they should change their name to private detective .
View more about Nightcrawler reviews
