As a result, the Chinese-style education method of "Tiger Mom" has attracted the attention of so many Americans. Although there are so many doubts, they reveal their insecurity in their hearts. Lao Mei is so arrogant and finally realizes that she can't do it. It seems that the Chinese people and the Chinese model are successful. In addition to being hypocritical and causing damage to other countries, the system under democracy and freedom is increasingly lazy, declining, and lacking competitiveness. So?
So Li Na succeeded, you see more and more Chinese are doing better than you in the highest competition. It is time for Americans to learn from the Chinese. You see, Fukuyama said that China has nothing to learn from the United States, and the Western value system is not so convincing in front of China. Wow, it looks like China is really on the rise.
Forgive me for being so vulgar that it seems to be deliberately linking these together. This is after seeing the news recently and naturally linking these information together and naturally feel that they give me the above concept. No, I don't want to say whether brainwashing and information is deliberately selected and distorted. Because in a culture and society that inherently treats information in a distorted, selective way of thinking, it is useless to discuss these. And when you try to show people here with a different cognition, no matter whether those cognitions are extreme or not, ordinary individuals with independent thinking will recognize in comprehensive information, they will think that you are grandstanding and deliberate Show your difference and higher intelligence, and the attack and saucer go into action. Then don't tell me my observations and knowledge? No, anyway, if you don't say it that way, it's better to say it, at least it's beneficial to your own thinking and summary, and you have to believe that freedom is always growing!
People in this world have formed different communities of destiny because of many factors, which are geographical, historical, cultural, and environmental. This community is prominently manifested in the identification of the social system or the civilization behind the system. Anglo-Saxon civilization, East Asian civilization, and Islamic civilization are the most important forms of civilization in the world today, and they have each created their own systems and models. In today's world, or in the last few hundred years, the civilization and institutional forms of Western white people have widely influenced the rest of the world, although that influence has changed from uncivilized to civilized in line with their own growth process. The values such as freedom and democracy behind the Western model are called universal values and they think that they are applicable to other civilizations, and they think that it is the modernization of other civilizations that needs to be transformed. Indeed, many places in other civilizations have been in transition over the past century, even China or Iran. But other civilizations have also been less aware of their need to become Western whites, especially in China, North Korea, and parts of the Islamic world. They have all kinds of reasons and motives, and you can't think there's all wrong or all right there. I always feel that advocating the theory of clash of civilizations or treating different civilizations differently is outdated. It may be inevitable in the beginning but can easily be used as the main excuse to maintain backward and inhumane systems. Since universal value is universal, it must be the conscious and developing law of all human nature. It will bring a driving force for the progress and self-transformation of a community, so you cannot think that white people have created universal values such as freedom and democracy. Just practitioners and transforming their society affected other civilizations. If you ignore the help of various civilizations in the development of universal values and only see the white people in practice, it is not beneficial to everyone. And you ignore that in the western world, it is also obtained by so many people's struggles, and thus maintains their own development and restrains the external oppression of those countries' backward authoritarian ideology, although these two struggles are still going on. So when some people take advantage of the unmodern nature of their own people to instill the Western threat theory, indoctrinate the particular theory of universal values, and try to prove their failure, such a system and the individuals in it are disappointing. Sadly, the Chinese model is such a system and the more speculative it seems to be more successful. Because it only requires domination and the satisfaction of each class's desire for domination, unlike the Islamic world, there is still spirit. In China, except for the exclusion or distortion of universal values, anything else can be accepted, and most of them are evil and indulgent. And this country has a long history of fighting and eradicating dissidents to make the system stable and unchanging! Therefore, the spear of mankind has always been The shield is not between civilized countries, but the contradiction between backward ideology and modernization. This contradiction still exists in white society and even more so in other civilizations. It's just that the world is complex, there are many illusions, different regions have different stages of development, and that human progress is at a low ebb (spiritually and ideologically, you have to see that our times are quite stupid) that has led to the rise of China that appears to be. And is that really a rise? Thinking in the best direction is the preparation before a complete change!
Therefore, it is very normal to have a beginning attitude in a culture and system like ours, but does the mainstream society in the United States have doubts about democracy and freedom and the universal values above it? In a complex world and a world in which China is rising and the West is declining, China is mentioned or related to China in so many reflections. Is it what the media here is promoting? I think in any case, in the mainstream values of the United States, China has never been an example to learn from, but only a driving force for pressure and reflection! In their view, whether it is the success of the Chinese in the Western world, the educational "success" of the "Tiger Mother" or Li Na's success, they are reminding them to return to the values and attitudes they should have (restore true democracy and freedom). and the universal values, ideas, attitudes that they generate to face education, family, work, and life, find what degenerates them and eliminate them. Instead of denying one's own values and social consensus) or justify the success of those values and the success of their system or the world. That is more like the attitude of the United States when faced with the rise of the Soviet Union, but the American elite knows that letting China fail will not bring long-term success to the United States. Growing together and exerting an influence on China's real transformation is beneficial to the world! So Obama
's attitude towards China is right!
So there was "Social Network", and there was a heated discussion of "Tiger Mom" Chinese-style education, these reflections on education that are crucial to the future of the country. Some people think that "The Social Network" is Zuckerberg's success story or a showcase of his lawsuit, and they are wrong. It is talking about American education and young people, or it is critiquing and reflecting on American education and young people. We all know that education is the future of society and the foundation of changing society. A good education system can save a society and promote social progress! The United States has the best higher education in the world, but it has increasingly become an elite education like China. The gap between universities is growing, and the fairness and role of basic education are becoming more and more problematic. There is a problem with American education. As McMoore said, the yearning for money or the pressure of money makes young people speculate and focus their talents and energy on making money and enjoying themselves. As shown in "Wall Street 2", capital invades society and makes people lose their ideals, values and morals. The money-obsessed, successful men and women of "The Social Network", fame and fortune blinded their eyes and corrupted them! And isn't that kind of success the kind of success in our model? If so, how could they ever compete for the "genius" in our model? It is not fear of competition in the concept of Westerners, such as Li Na's success (in a free and fair system, Li Na, who has talent and individuality, has achieved heights that cannot be achieved in the Chinese model. Such success and Competition is good for all!), but fear the wrong way over the right way, and that brings disaster to all! To revive the United States, it is necessary to change education, so both the Obama administration and the intellectuals are promoting changes at the institutional and spiritual levels! The emergence of "Tiger Mother" brought this kind of reflection and change that lasted for more than a year to a climax. In fact, in the discussion of "tiger mother" Chinese-style education, the focus is not on her methods, those things have long been proven wrong, and the "success" of "tiger mother" children is also common. That is in the middle class in China, in Taiwanese society, in the Chinese who immigrated to the United States. Amy Chua's parents can also write a book exactly like her, because their daughter "succeeds" too! Is that a real success? Maybe they understand and they will be happy themselves but just as a good tyranny makes slaves grateful and happy in a certain environment, as human beings, maybe Amy Chua and her children are not successful. We often see Chinese immigrating to the United States, because many of our own concepts are not modernized, we understand Western society with our own concepts, and fully integrate into the West externally, such as lifestyle and social interaction. The way but rarely becomes mainstream, and in some fields that require modern thinking, it will never become elite, such as the humanities field. Was Amy Chua successful in her own right, as a law professor at Yale? Or spiritually, like those who studied abroad in famous universities in Taiwan and mainland China, after getting the label, they all lived a Chinese-style aristocratic life. Wouldn't that be a huge waste to the society and a waste of their own talents? Moreover, successful books like Amy Chua continue to appear in modern Western society, but they all prove that the author and the ideas inside are wrong. Where has someone told you about your success? In modern society, success is a process of self-awakening and transcendence. Where are the standards and patterns? The conclusion of all discussions is to find oneself and find a correct understanding of people and human nature! As Obama said in his State of the Union address, it is necessary to restore the education of children instead of letting them go, but it is definitely not the way of education of Amy Chua, and that kind of education was seen in the movie "Heartbeat" in the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s. get! It's respect, it's communication, it's setting downlines and suggestions instead of shaping and demanding what to do! Pay attention to reading, comprehension, science, and numeracy skills, but not in the same way as those high school students in Shanghai who have achieved the world's number one science and reading skills! In the end, even the "tiger mother" was reflecting, she said that she should respect her child more and not hurt the child's self-esteem. But if she still uses the common dualistic thinking in our culture to compromise between Chinese and Western attitudes, and talks about creativity and freedom on the basis of shaping, asking instead of advice, and respecting, then she and her children will still not achieve the true meaning of life. Success and true creativity, freedom! How she and her way of educating children and their success are like the twins in "The Social Network", the latter are blinded by something, while Amy Chua's way of educating children is to educate children with a tyrannical attitude of faith and has achieved peace. The same "success" as twins! ! As Obama said in his State of the Union address, it is necessary to restore the education of children instead of letting them go, but it is definitely not the way of education of Amy Chua, and that kind of education was seen in the movie "Heartbeat" in the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s. get! It's respect, it's communication, it's setting downlines and suggestions instead of shaping and demanding what to do! Pay attention to reading, comprehension, science, and numeracy skills, but not in the same way as those high school students in Shanghai who have achieved the world's number one science and reading skills! In the end, even the "tiger mother" was reflecting, she said that she should respect her child more and not hurt the child's self-esteem. But if she still uses the common dualistic thinking in our culture to compromise between Chinese and Western attitudes, and talks about creativity and freedom on the basis of shaping, asking instead of advice, and respecting, then she and her children will still not achieve the true meaning of life. Success and true creativity, freedom! How she and her way of educating children and their success are like the twins in "The Social Network", the latter are blinded by something, while Amy Chua's way of educating children is to educate children with a tyrannical attitude of faith and has achieved peace. The same "success" as twins! ! As Obama said in his State of the Union address, it is necessary to restore the education of children instead of letting them go, but it is definitely not the way of education of Amy Chua, and that kind of education was seen in the movie "Heartbeat" in the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s. get! It's respect, it's communication, it's setting downlines and suggestions instead of shaping and demanding what to do! Pay attention to reading, comprehension, science, and numeracy skills, but not in the same way as those high school students in Shanghai who have achieved the world's number one science and reading skills! In the end, even the "tiger mother" was reflecting, she said that she should respect her child more and not hurt the child's self-esteem. But if she still uses the common dualistic thinking in our culture to compromise between Chinese and Western attitudes, and talks about creativity and freedom on the basis of shaping, asking instead of advice, and respecting, then she and her children will still not achieve the true meaning of life. Success and true creativity, freedom! How she and her way of educating children and their success are like the twins in "The Social Network", the latter are blinded by something, while Amy Chua's way of educating children is to educate children with a tyrannical attitude of faith and has achieved peace. The same "success" as twins!
Finally, back to the beginning of "The Social Network", Zuckerberg's girlfriend said to him: You should be yourself! Americans are never learning from China, but just reminding themselves to find themselves. As the girl at the end of "The Social Network" said: You're not a jerk, but you try to be a jerk! America is not a jerk, but it's becoming as jerk as China, so it's time for a change! What about us? In fact, everything that happened in the United States about China is helpful to the United States, a society capable of self-reflection, but it is an excuse for us to stagnate our progress and obstruct all changes like the beginning! What are we proud of? That is a tragedy, in a country where nothing can be discussed and reflected, there will always be only correct rule but will bring disaster of unpredictable time!
View more about The Social Network reviews
