Most of the superhero movies, we audience are just passing by, this one is not, we seem to live in it.
I used to think that art needs to serve the public, and that what most people agree with is a good thing, such as novels, dramas, movies, paintings, etc., if the public agrees, it is always better. Recently, I have slowly changed my thinking, and I feel that the services of art are always "private". Sometimes they are the embodiment of the creator's own inner world, but they just happen to be accepted by the public.
The film may have some holes in the editing narrative, but the story he shows is not much at all. In my opinion, it's a bit close to the feel of an epic movie, a kind of "textured" movie. There is so much to discuss here.
Philosophy is a simple and complex thing, it can be thought and dig infinitely, there is never an exact answer, everyone can discuss a topic for a few minutes, think for a few minutes, argue for a few minutes. Everyone can be a philosopher, but today's world is no longer a fertile soil for thinking about philosophical issues. Everything is too fast!
Here are just some of my thoughts:
The movie seems to have everything unfolding before it, it doesn't fool you with any tricks, it makes you think, and it doesn't give an accurate answer in it.
The first time you watch this movie, it might be hard, but it seems normal to me because it's a movie like a novel. Reading an interesting novel is sometimes very painful, because some of the things the author wants to express are particularly obscure and may conflict with his own ideas. . .
. . . Writing a little jump, do not want to write?
Please watch it a few more times when you have nothing to do. This movie has a value for people to think about.
Then again, if you've read a lot of novels... maybe, probably, maybe this movie narrative won't be so hard for you to accept. . . ?
View more about Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice reviews
