Let's take a look at the main characters of the two orangutans in the film.
Will hunting: I was abused by my father when I was a child, resulting in "abandonment phobia", refusing to communicate with anyone, and finding a weird girlfriend who stinks, but dare not plan the future with her.
Professor of Psychology: I never forget my beloved wife who died of illness, thinking that the "angel that God specially sent down for him" has left, and there is no one else who can be called his wife.
The first impression of the two is very different, will be timid, professor affectionate. But the underlying logic is actually the same:
will: 1. Dad abuses himself --> Can't trust Dad --> Can't trust anyone else
2. All human beings can't be trusted like Dad -->
Professor: 1. Wife died of illness I can't stay with my wife
all the time --> I can't love
anyone else . If the reasoning is the same, why are the effects so different? Because the two people have different objects of affection, one is the father and the other is the wife.
Why is the effect different for different objects (the following is a personal guess), because the difficulty and expectation are different~!
The influence of a father on a child is too great to measure. Being abused by a father is a psychological shadow for everyone. And the audience can't be brought into the role of the father, as long as you are not too bt, the shadow of the child will not cause you to be very happy. So the whole incident was evaluated objectively, even if the father is not good, despair is not right.
For a man, how much he loves his wife can be measured. When a wife dies, she is buried with her whole heart, not everyone can do it. And when the audience is brought into the role of the wife: wow ~ dead and remembered, immediately burst into tears. So it doesn't matter whether despair is right or not, the key becomes: the reason for despair is to love one's wife, what an excellent quality to love one's wife! !
Conclusion:
attach too much importance to a person and fail to do what he/she wants, so don't expect the whole world, all these are to be probation and training. But whether this mentality itself is ws or great depends mainly on the difficulty of "too much attention" and the expectations of the audience.
Inference 1: What the audience expects is not an Electra child, but an affectionate husband.
Inference 2: The audience believes that children are prone to love their fathers, but they do not believe that husbands are often affectionate.
Corollary 3: In some cases, giving up on oneself can be pleasing. So there are always people who report to everyone how they have given up on themselves.
View more about Good Will Hunting reviews
