Hanslanda's ending is the same as Hitler's ending, it's a screen lust. In fact, Hitler's death was not so tragic. A man whom Heidegger hailed as "superior in action" could not have died under unhistoric conditions. If Hitler's ultimate fate suggests to us the unrecyclability (in other words, unforgivable) between national elites, then Hanslanda's ultimate fate reveals to us the "assimilation" of modernity as an individual, especially It is the assimilation of elites, which is difficult, but not completely blocked. All of Hanslanda's strategies have been successful, and everything is under control. Such a shrewd person, unless he is very sure, can't lay down his weapons on his enemy. He looks for the bastards and dare not touch him because he Imagine the discipline of iron, with other premodernities up and down, applicable in all countries. But he never imagined that the United States has truly become an unimaginable "wonderful" country controlled by nihilism, hedonism, and historicism. Therefore, Americans are also incalculable because they are blindly overwhelmed. No one could have predicted this step, so it was not Hanslanda's misstep, but his grief.
As an aside, Hanslanda wants to integrate into the United States because he sees that Germany will lose. Although Leo Strauss was persecuted and exiled to the United States, in the United States, Germans and Jews, although for different reasons, are equally regarded as the other. Schmidt's famous saying, the value of politics is to distinguish between enemy and friend. It is difficult to refute this statement, but the servants of liberalism, because of the value judgments already formed, are able to make many contrary opinions. This sentence is correct, I have to read Hannah Arendt.
Finally, let's talk about the relationship between the actor and the character.
It is not that art creates a one-sided image, but that the shallow understanding of the audience creates a new image in their minds that is contrary to the work of art itself. Therefore, the author has always attached great importance to the openness and generation in literary and artistic works. sex.
Sometimes, it is not the excellent and outstanding actors who interpret the vivid screen image, on the contrary, the rich and rich character setting provides the actors with a wide space to play. The Joker in "The Dark Knight" and Hans Landa in "Inglourious Basterds" were originally very malleable characters. Although Heath Ledger and Christopher Waltz performed them perfectly, if they were replaced by other excellent actors , not necessarily better, but not much worse. On the contrary, without the plasticity of the role, no matter how good the performance will be, it will be empty. In a word, it is easy for a good script to make a good actor; it is difficult for a good actor to save a bad script.
View more about Inglourious Basterds reviews
