a half dead tree

Joelle 2022-04-21 09:01:13

There is no doubt that this is a very commercial suspense film, but now that such films are emerging one after another, this film seems to be of poor skill and lack of stamina.
The reason is not that the story is unattractive. In fact, it is enough to be interesting that it is only based on real events and the murderer is still undetermined, but it is also because of this that the feeling after watching is far less than expected. And what investors don't want to see. There is also a reason that cannot be ignored. The reason why this film has been placed high on by everyone before it is released is due to the director's classic "Seven Deadly Sins". Naturally, the audience will inevitably make a comparison.
It is a pity that this film did not continue the success and excellent reputation of "Seven Deadly Sins". The structure is loose, the clues are messy, the main line is unclear, and the protagonist is unknown. The basic elements and characteristics of suspense films have been diluted in this film, so the audience is often distracted. Not surprisingly, too many unnecessary explanations and unnecessary shots were once drowsy. If this is a literary film, you may be patient to consider the director's style artistically or the depth of the film academically, but as a commercial suspense film, the above will only test the audience's endurance and psychological gap tolerance Powerful criticism.
From a certain point of view, the style of "Zodiac" tends to be more realistic, showing the director's awareness of trying to break away from the fixed mode of suspense or crime films that mainly stimulate the nerves in many ways such as visual and auditory. The style is obviously unpopular. Since it does not exist in the form of documentaries, it is necessary to pay more attention to how to avoid the important. Not every sentence is worth recording, and not every episode is worth reviewing. One difference between making a movie and writing a diary is that you have to make necessary trade-offs in a limited space, just like the nutrients for a tree are found first. It is the main trunk, then the branches and leaves and stamens, and too much nutrients will only rot the roots and eventually lead to the necrosis of the entire tree.
Speaking of which, I think of "Memories of Murder", which is also based on a real case. The portrayal of the characters, the setting of the plot, the use of the camera, the processing of details, and the creation of sound effects are more like a "movie", so it is more attractive. People are also more attractive. Worrying, angry, moved, anxious... The audience still prefers the feeling of being led by the nose when they suddenly realize the reality, and the experience of intermingling hints and accidents.
The director of this film also has a very good work like "The Seven Deadly Sins", so I would rather explain the dramatic change in the film's shooting style and technique as a creative idea, but unfortunately, such an attempt is still a failure in my opinion. In the end, wanting to express too much disturbs the rhythm of the movie and kills the audience's thinking.
In fact, whether it is an adaptation of a real event or a biography of a historical figure, first of all, it is a movie. You can't expect or restore the facts and truth. In this case, why not take off this heavy hat and treat the stories and characters with a normal heart. , choose a specific angle to shoot the work from your own understanding?

View more about Zodiac reviews

Extended Reading
  • Hilbert 2022-03-23 09:01:12

    2013-06-15 Second brush. Really a masterpiece

  • Emmalee 2021-10-20 18:59:58

    The film critics have mixed reviews for this film, and the reviews are even two extremes. Personally, I almost watched this 157-minute film with good eyeballs. The film comprehensively describes the painstaking detection process of a serial homicide case more than 40 years ago. Although the case is not solved according to the procedures, everyone knows who the murderer is. The film is nuanced, very large, with intricate details, and the actors perform well. A good film.

Zodiac quotes

  • Robert Graysmith: Did he say they got a print?

    Paul Avery: A partial.

    Robert Graysmith: Whoa. Dude, he wears his gun like Bullitt.

    Paul Avery: No, McQueen got that... from Toschi.

    Robert Graysmith: Does he think that Zodiac's gonna send another code? 'Cause I think Zodiac's gonna send another code.

    Paul Avery: Jesus Harold Christ on rubber crutches, Bobby, what are you doing? You're doing that thing. The thing that we discussed, the thing that I don't like, starts with an L...

    Robert Graysmith: Oh, looming.

    Paul Avery: Yeah.

  • Paul Avery: So... what's new?

    Robert Graysmith: I've been thinking. Somebody should write a book.

    Paul Avery: Somebody should write a fucking book, that's for sure.

    [beat]

    Paul Avery: About what?

    Robert Graysmith: About Zodiac.

    Paul Avery: That's not new.

    Robert Graysmith: I've been thinking that if you put all the information together, maybe you could jog something loose. And I was thinking you know the case best.

    Paul Avery: Yeah, that's true.

    Robert Graysmith: And you know all the players and you have all the files.

    Paul Avery: Lost them.

    Robert Graysmith: You lost them?

    Paul Avery: Or I tossed them. I don't know. I moved onto a boat. You know we work in the daily business, right? As in, today? What do you think we were doing back then? Do you know more people die in the East Bay commute every three months than that idiot ever killed? He offed a few citizens, he wrote a few letters and then he faded into a footnote.

    [beat, menacingly]

    Paul Avery: Not that I haven't been sitting here idly waiting for you to drop by and reinvigorate my sense of purpose. It was four years ago. Let it fucking go.

    Robert Graysmith: You're wrong. It was important.

    Paul Avery: [sighs] Then what did you ever do about it... if it was so important? What did you do? You *hovered* over my desk, you stole from wastebaskets. AM I BEING UNKIND? Oh, that's right. I forgot. You went to the library.

    [smiles darkly]

    Robert Graysmith: I'm sorry I bothered you.