All clues are listed to the audience, letters, notes, passwords, interpersonal relationships, evidence, and even the crime process and crime scene are all restored one by one. According to the most complete method and time sequence, it is not only the need for narrative, but also brings us a strong sense of participation. Deep in it, like two newspaper reporters.
Perhaps the appeal of the story comes from the uniqueness of the case. It is rare to have so many clues, but at the same time, there are so many murderers who can connect with these clues. Who is ZODIAC? Or what exactly is ZODIAC? Is this a case like "The Laughing Man"? Stand Alone Complex.
Maybe the truth is within 50 yards. But you can't prove it. So it's not true.
Just feel like you missed a clue, a stolen cryptography book in the library. Couldn't their suspicions be further established based on who served in those places? Passwords must be a major feature of ZODIAC, and even if someone fakes it later, the original inventor must have been inspired by library books. Then the suspect who served there must most likely be the original ZODIAC.
View more about Zodiac reviews
