After reading one or two other movie reviews, my favorite is a bean friend named Carpenter. He said that he watched Harry Potter grow up, or grow old.
I feel the same way.
In addition, for the Half-Blood Prince, the scolding wave of fans in mainland China is relatively high. I personally agree with many of the slurs (of course, I prefer to call them opinions). Many of the director's scenes, I have to say, are obviously made with the audience, or the Chinese audience, as if they were children revisiting the beautiful animation. Another film reviewer said a lot of what we wanted to see and what we didn't want to see, including a lot of scenes that Ha 1234 used.
Generally speaking, as a director, it is very important to understand the audience's needs for how to make a movie with a well-known plot of the original, and then to produce the effect that the audience needs. Moreover, David Yates seems to have failed to do so, especially, he failed to meet the needs of this large audience in mainland China. That alone was enough for him to regret.
However, in fact, I don't feel so angry. The director's way of thinking is different from that of ordinary audiences. This should be a fact that everyone can generally accept. His perspective on the plot is different from our perspective. Moreover, the director is not Chinese, and the original is a thoroughly British novel. Well... I think I can be lenient and think that this is again the difference in cultural values that leads to different views on the important and the non-critical.
David Yates makes up plots that aren't in the books, like the scene where the mad woman named Bey and the werewolf burn the Weasleys down. I can see what this plot is trying to convey, Harry's hatred of Madman Bey, Ginny's love for Harry, Death Eaters' hatred, whatever. However, this plot is inserted into the main line of the whole film, but it makes people even more confused. Ginny and Harry's first kiss, made up, feels weird, in fact, the plot of Harry's book collection is of great significance to the final battle in the seventh book, there are countless things hidden in the Room of Requirement over the centuries . I don't know if David Yeats filmed Ha 6 without reading the seventh book. He didn't seem to bother to design a plot that would be useful for the audience to understand the seventh book.
Not to mention that he pre-shoots what Malfoy does sneakily throughout the Half-Blood Prince without being sneaky. I feel sorry for this.
As for Snape being bullied...well, it should all be in H7, and it's the last point. Speaking of Snape, frankly I think the actor's acting is very good, I will be angry that his role in the sixth part was cut for lack of IQ, and I will look forward to his performance in Ha 7. I had seen him act in other plays before, only one or two of them, and they were not outstanding, but now that I think about it, those roles he played also had strong Snape characteristics.
I should probably conclude that the actor's own temperament was designed for Snape.
The director made some deliberate arrangements. For example, Harry and Dumbledore heard a few words of dialogue between Snape and Dumbledore before they set off to the cave to look for Horcruxes. If you have noticed and read the seventh book and have a little memory of the plot, you will understand that the one or two lines of dialogue in their tower have certain hints to the plot clues of the seventh movie.
This is probably the most meaningful part of the plot that the director deliberately added in Ha 6.
In the end, Titi Malfoy, well, the final rendering was not strong enough. However, I also admire his acting skills, starting from the tugging little boy in the first part.
I also feel that Ron's acting has been... er, ruined. into such a comedic character. However, at this point, JK Rowling also bears a certain responsibility.
Huh... The first time I wrote a movie review on Bean, for the "Harry Potter" that I grew up with.
I hope my assessment is more objective.
View more about Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince reviews
