For fans of the two films, "The Order of the Phoenix" and "The "Half-Blood Prince", this name must have been more disappointing than expected. . After all, after making the fifth and sixth so boring, will the excitement of the last one also turn into a boring "literary blockbuster"? Fortunately, David has correctly narrated the narrative this time, and changed the narrative style of the first two steps in a slow manner. The tension and relief work well together, and the progression is orderly. Gives me a feeling of being in one go. The upper part ends with the burial of the house-elf Dobby. I turned it over and it was Chapter 24, 405 pages of the British Children's Edition. So the upper part should contain more plots than the lower part. I watched the WB sign at the end of the subtitles and didn't see any film clips. It seemed that I was planning to make a film of nearly five hours, and I was afraid that the audience could not bear it and would be divided.
In fact, I think the first two are also due to the original. The original "Order of the Phoenix" was originally a bit long (although as a fan of Ha, I said it was very cool), and most of the content was related to the transformation of the three HHR three people's adolescence, so the movie that takes the essence of the original can only be shown to you. Out of the theme ideas. And the screenplay is rewritten, development and details should be different. But David's first two films feel like this is not the case at all. However, with Rowling's supervision, it won't deviate from where it will go... Compared with the first two films, the rhythm is much tighter, there are a lot of new information points, and there will be no bridge for you to go out to the toilet.
I remember watching "Half-Blood Prince", the most interesting comment is: a movie without a climax. If you want to evaluate this movie, I am afraid to say "from the beginning to the end". Of course it's an exaggeration! The content arrangement of the movie and the original "Deathly Hallows" is quite consistent. Personally, I feel that this is the most in line with the original work, from the development of the story to some details. Even some of the laughs fit in, like Hermione's beaded pouch "dropping to the ground with a loud 'boom'"*, which is shown in another way in the movie. All the necessary plots to move the story forward are there and well arranged. David's own advantages have also been preserved (ah hey, can his director not have his own characteristics).
Foreshadowing Queen Rowling
For the entire series, what amazed or sighed time and time again during the reading process was that Rowling surprised me in the arrangement of the foreshadowing. Maybe you also have this experience. The witty little plots in the first few films actually acted as important clues to promote the development of the story. Speaking of which, I have to complain about the movie. In my opinion, what the film lacks the most compared to the original is logic. There is not enough foreshadowing in the film for the necessary plots, the optional and the critical go hand in hand. Fortunately, the most important plot still has it. I don't know if David asked Christopher Nolan for some advice before filming this film. Anyway, the comparison between the film and the original is that the former is a stage play with a running account and generally takes turns. The latter makes people speculate and guess during the reading process, and finally shocks you.
Unfortunately for HHR and DER
, Daniel does feel more and more like the youth version of Mr. Zhao Benshan from the side profile. Emma didn't say anything, just really wanted to smash the glass window of a certain bar and rushed in... In the end, it was Rupert, I thought Ron's casting was really good. If you're not fooled by Emma's good looks, then Rupert is indeed the best. Anyway, Daniel felt very stiff from the beginning, and his accent was not very good. Another point I agree with is that Hermione is too beautiful. So there is a girl in HP who is out of reality and has both beauty and wisdom (beat me). In fact, in the original book, her appearance matched Ron quite well.
Then Bill and Fleur sat on the Thestral and gave me a bit of a Beauty and the Beast delusion...
House Elf Liberation Front
Compared to Peeves the scene was cut. What saddens me even more is that Dobby, Hermione Jane Granger and the House Elf Liberation Front are not mentioned at all. This group of elves who silently served the wizards selflessly at the bottom of the class and their struggles were eliminated in this way, making viewers who have not seen the original feel that house-elves are a group of strange creatures with different personalities and volatile temperaments. But the meaning of Dobby's existence is like... Hermione and Dobby fought together with him, and they also rose up as a "mudblood" against "pure blood" discrimination. Look at conservative Ron and numb Harry, like many of us. Plus Dolores Umbridge and Bellatrix Lestrange and frontal Minerva McGonagall, Sybill T Sibyll Trelawney You'll find the women in this series are strong. This is Rowling's thoughts that have been mainstreamed in the movie... There are
so many complaints, if you find any spoilers, please hit the "Key Plot Reveal" button and report me. Then there are movie viewing suggestions (spoiler...):
1. There will be scenes that scare children
2. There will be scenes that are slightly unsuitable for children
3. Students who haven't seen the previous part look for the ashes to give a summary of the foreshadowing
. Dobby salute.
Note
* This is a provisional translation of the original, "...and dropped her small beaded bag, which made a loud thump quite disproportionate to its size." --Rowling, JK Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Limited , 120
2007.
**Director of Inception
View more about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 reviews
