It was Quentin who knew the king with a discerning eye and gave Leonardo a thorough aristocratic image, but he was just a bastard.
I don't know if Leonardo had grasped the poor boy's heart too well. When Gatsby first saw Daisy after a five-year absence, he was so embarrassed that he hit "walls" everywhere, and his hair was sloppy. Forehead, cramped like a child. His acting skills are at ease, without the slightest pretence. From his eyes and movements, he can see the essence of his poor boy.
Even though he was calling for wind and rain, dressed luxuriously, and behaved elegantly, he could never forget his inner inferiority and fear, so when Tom pierced his disguise with a sharp and vicious way, he finally broke out.
Seeing that scene, I couldn't help but say in my heart, Leonardo is so handsome. Only he can be like an angel or a devil, so he can come and go freely.
Some time ago, I read an interview and said that Hollywood's films in the past two years have been relatively disappointing, and only "Django Unchained" and "The Great Gatsby" are barely satisfactory.
Look, two films, one is produced by Quentin, and the other is Baz Luhrman, who is known for his ability to create gorgeous scenes, and asked him to direct a classic. From a planning perspective, these two films had to be more. Expected.
Of course, they all used Leonardo.
View more about The Great Gatsby reviews
