"Can you take full control, or destroy what you've created?" "Humans."
Assuming that humans did not evolve but were created, it is safe to guess that humans are indeed the best "product". Excellent does not mean quick fighting skills, an invincible body (invulnerable), and that human beings are also endowed with the ability to be easily destroyed. In revisiting the movies I watched as a child, I found that many of them convey this concept. You can be smart, you can evolve, but you're going to be destroyed, so you have the emotion of patience, and the mind to think about how to protect yourself. will drive evolution. If a person has a strong body and thinks he is invincible, he will definitely vote, and if there is an unknown weapon, he will also go head-to-head, because the thinking habits have been solidified and he will not think first. Then the gene is not good. It will cycle. I feel the wisdom of the creator. And we humans often create things that we can't solve by ourselves.
Assuming that humans are the best products, the strongest one is the ability to "learn", and the "learning" should be driven by "curiosity". Then "automatic learning": how do you make a program or machine produce "curiosity"? And finally, "joking and irony," which is different from the cold machine sense. Now, it should be human-designed algorithms rather than programs or machines "actively" learning, right? (I don’t understand. Please point out if I’m wrong.) Without breaking through this point, AI has nothing to worry about. It is just a tool to improve efficiency. It may be very capable of right and wrong, but it will not distinguish right from wrong (such as spontaneous irony). So it is necessary to be cautious when the AI will lie and purposefully lose to the opponent.It feels like studying brain science is a long and unrewarding road, and it is a bit of a headache. And with robotic arms, it's much easier to replace organ-like machines. The weakness of human beings is their fragile flesh. The advantage is that with curiosity, there will be automatic learning, creativity, rich emotions, and empathy.
Today, I found out that the little brother who delivers the food is already very close to my house, but because big data is still a fixed route, he has to return to me after he has delivered to a farther place. This involves efficiency issues. It must be sent to the nearest one first. The general reference mentioned above will not distinguish between right and wrong, and will not be flexible. I think of the concept conveyed in a movie previously. In the same situation where two people are very dangerous, the machine calculates which one is "more logical" and more cost-effective to save first. But people consider both, and they can think, "This is the difference," and then listen to human beings first to save the person who doesn't seem to be worthwhile, and then the other also survives. This is the difference. Therefore, in case in the future, AI and intelligence are everywhere in life, and the most intelligent ones are human beings, so you must believe in yourself. We have advantages that cannot be completely dependent on AI.Just like we have been doing things for a long time, we will never have the initial cautious attitude. This is a taboo. Irreversible situations lead us to believe that practice makes perfect. The people who drown are people who are very good swimmers. This is my age group's most vigilant psychology at this stage. Although all aspects of experience are slowly increasing, we must always remain cautious at the beginning. I don’t know how to express it. Don't get caught up in the feeling of being solidified.
Because I pay attention to AI, I think of this film I watched when I was a child, and I came to review it and find that the drowning incident experienced by the protagonist in the film expresses this point of view very well, although he remains vigilant.
Regarding AI and humans, if you compare me to a washing machine, I can't compare. The washing machine works for 1 hour, and I may have to spend the morning washing the quilt, which is still difficult for me. When I was young, my mother always took me to wash the quilts. Two people wring it dry. uhm.. In fact, intelligence has been everywhere in the past few decades; it depends on how you understand it. Everyone's understanding is different. He says his, you say yours. The problem is, they can still "argue" (debate). So "people" are interesting (funny).
So if this paragraph is discussed by a machine, he must feel that the logic is wrong first, so I will not argue with you. For example, a conflict between a girlfriend and a straight boyfriend The boyfriend's needs are the reason for the girlfriend's anger. This is the difference between machines and humans.
mood. Therefore, "Tarzan collapses before the front but the color does not change." Very rational human beings, you say that they have evolved into AI, or AI has emotions, does not care about logic, makes mistakes, and can evolve into human beings. This is a very interesting question.
View more about I, Robot reviews
