In the past two years, domestic film critics have begun to plagiarize YouTube, but the strength of YouTube itself is average, and many of them are wrong, such as the twitch-style photography of "Bourne Bound". This film has only been praised by laymen, and the directors and editors do not like it. The tubing has been analyzed, to the effect that the jitter of the lens is combined with the complete action. He should mean that this style allows the audience to be there, not fragmented editing. The untenable analysis is obviously the editing method of Hollywood action movies, why the twitches, I don't know. It may be an innovation of the director. If it is a Hong Kong film editing method, the camera keeps twitching, and the audience will clearly feel their pretence! For example, the domestic special edition 3D! Why is hand-held photography artificially shaken? I don't know, although the director has explained it, it is obviously nonsense. Since the lens is not a subjective perspective, where does it come from? Inaccurate focus seems more like the photographer is constantly twitching and unable to focus properly. As an attempt, the first two films were really novel, and after that, the director and cameraman were immersed in the pleasure of active twitching, and the style was unrestrained. "The Life of the Disgusted Matsuko" is also the problem, the abuse of advertising techniques.
Daily Film Review 20220301
View more about The Bourne Identity reviews
