Looking angry.
What is the foreshadowing of the deer in front of the audience hinting at? This hint is not obvious enough. Because the film is too vague.
After entering the white house, the suspenseful elements are not progressive, but piled up together, giving the audience a chaotic feeling, and there is no logical relationship between events.
The thing that made me complain the most so much that I couldn't watch it fast-forward at the end was that this criminal group was too good to fight. You played half a progress bar in front of you, and then it was so easy to be broken by the black brother? Doing such a risky thing has the vigilance of a three-year-old child and no prepared solution. How can this family get three transplants? This level of confidentiality and prevention and control will be taken care of by the police after the first case is completed, right? It's not like those missing black guys have no friends or family, the police have been eyeing you for a long time, okay? Does a story of this level need to be described in half a movie?
In addition, the mother's hypnosis process. During the first hypnosis process, the lines were too functional. When the lines come out, the audience relies on themselves to make up the plot. Because the lines did not play a role in advancing the plot! It all depends on the background music scene and the actors to set off the atmosphere, but your logic is not correct. My picture as an audience is: This is it? What's wrong with this hypnosis? The lines are too weak! Not a good line!
The film lacks an explanation for the principle of this hypnosis, and it is all up to the audience to guess. Moreover, 10 years ago, movies about hypnosis emerged in an endless stream, and now showing audiences this level of hypnotic plots is too far from the audience's actual viewing level and viewing habits.
What we're looking at is intuitive, clear plot development.
When the male protagonist killed their whole family, I didn't feel the anger that the male protagonist should have at that time.
The most unbearable thing is that every time he kills one, the male protagonist still has time to hesitate and think? ! When it comes to life and death, a normal person would be extremely vigilant, trot and never be soft-hearted, solve the whole family in the quickest way, and then leave that ghost place quickly? Still have time to walk around the house? Still have time to think about saving that maid? Big brother, you are dying and you are trapped in the house for several days, okay?
Regarding the arrangement of the two episodes where the heroine's brother suddenly stopped the hero at the door and bumped into the maid on the road, I really don't see the purpose. Because the end of your film did not reflect the meaning of these two places.
The most incomprehensible thing for me is: the film doesn't have any explanation for the case at the end? After this man's experience, wouldn't he go to the police and tell the police what happened to him? Wouldn't this vicious case of racial discrimination be reported by the local media? And the attitude of the police on this kind of case, do they think the white people who committed the crime are guilty or innocent? That's the most important thing!
If you don't have the last of these? Then why did you tell such a long story earlier? Also arrange a career for the male protagonist that has something to do with the police system? What are these for?
This film is a racist stunt. In the end, the director did not dare to give an explanation or an attitude. Are you afraid that the film will become too controversial after the attitude is given, and the public opinion evaluation will not affect the award?
Incomprehensible. And I didn't feel scary at all after reading it, I just thought that the white people deserved to die, and the rest were gone. Because the film does not guide the audience in the direction of thinking.
thats it. enough
View more about Get Out reviews
