A straightforward film. Not a suspense movie, not a thriller.
=========
The black man and the white woman went to see her parents.
The two black servants feel very strange.
Then a group of people gathered, and they saw a black man who seemed to be an acquaintance.
When the flash shot, the black man was wrong.
The black man and the white woman went to the lake to talk, while the father-in-law communicated with a group of white men.
At first, it seemed that my father-in-law was playing a game of word cards. When the camera zoomed out, I found that there was a portrait of a black man beside my father-in-law. It turned out to be an auction.
Normal logic, this should be a white woman hooking a black man, and then privately trafficking people.
The black man chatted with his friend the black man police officer who seemed to be familiar, and found that he was indeed an acquaintance, but he disappeared, and now his behavior has changed.
By the way, the black man also found the photo and learned that he is not the so-called "first boyfriend" of the white woman at all, which shows that the white woman lied, and it seems that there is something wrong with the family.
The black man wanted to escape, but was caught by a family who had already prepared.
The black man woke up and was tied to the sofa. The reason was explained in detail on the TV. It was very simple. Because the black man was in good health, the white man arrested the black man to change his brain and replace his old body. Therefore, the previous auction was not a seller, but a life-threatening one. There is also a forcible "sublimation" here. The buyer this time wants the "artistic eyes" of the black man.
The black man escaped before the operation and killed the whole family. The surgical assistant smashed the ball to death, the father-in-law stabbed the deer antler to death, the mother-in-law used a fruit knife for a second, the eldest brother stabbed down with the doorknob and trampled to death, the black maid crashed into the car and died, and the black servant woke up his original consciousness with a flashing light, The valet shot down the white woman and then blew himself up.
This is also "sublimated". The black man bumped into the black maid (actually grandmother), recalled the death of his mother, and tried to take her to the doctor (I don't think normal people would do this in this context).
The black man tried to strangle the white woman who was still a little angry, but in the end he couldn't. end.
Another ending on the Internet is that the black man strangled the heroine, and then two police officers came and took him away.
===========
Let me make it clear, this is a movie that doesn't require guessing, just a movie that will be misjudged in the auction scene.
Even if the "dark ending" spread on the Internet, I think it's normal, the police who came here are probably not accomplices, even if it is, a dead male protagonist, covering up the truth, it is not dark. ——What can be called a dark ending is often "forced to be cruel", and with some "fatalism", it is called darkness. The dark feature is that "the options are all tragic", like two railroad tracks tying people up and not derailing, and then asking you which way to choose. ——The two endings of the feature film and the online transmission, no matter which one is set, belongs to normal logic, and it is completely unnecessary to raise it to "light/darkness".
On the other hand, this family does not bring the black man into the operating room before the operation, which is the first unprofessional. It is the second unprofessional to not give the black man an anesthesia first by relying on hypnosis. Wake up directly from hypnosis without saying (can you wake up by grabbing the sofa?), this is the unprofessionalism of the plot. ——Even if you explain, for example, if the buyer becomes ill and needs immediate surgery (explain the first and second points), and the male protagonist grabs the sofa and catches the thorn in it (explains waking up), it’s still good, I always feel that this movie cuts After watching it, you have the main screen, okay, I didn't sort out the plot from the audience's point of view at all.
What I am surprised is why this film can talk about "racial discrimination" and "political metaphor"... You can't call it discrimination just because the opposite is black and white, nor can it be because of "white inside and black outside" , to say how deep the political connotation of this film is. ——If I am a movie with people of different occupations on the street, am I a "master of connotation", "depicting all kinds of human states", "king of metaphors"? ——I guess some people will say, "This is what the director said personally during the interview", so why don't you check whether the director "has the ability to tell a good story"? I wrote a novel, called "The Foolish Old Man Moves the Mountain", and then I said, "This is a metaphor for the fixed social class, the powerlessness of the people at the bottom, the helplessness of society, and I can only ask God to worship Buddha and hope that the sky will fall." These words can be touched to some extent above, but can you believe it?
===========
The movie has no major problems, 6 points.
Auction guess wrong once, plus 0.5 points.
In the climax counterattack part, the script/editing is perfunctory, and 0.5 points will be deducted.
Small cost, but there is no "bright plot", no increase or decrease.
View more about Get Out reviews
