It's not the similarity but the difference that decides you

Paige 2022-03-22 09:01:05

One of the long-standing problems of the series is that the script's shaping of Harry makes the audience lack empathy. The first two films can also rely on the actor's own charm to make up for it. As the actor's age increases (the appearance value continues to decline) In this episode, the audience has a completely indifferent attitude towards Harry. The role of Waterloo directly offsets most of the fun of the story, not to mention that the story of this episode is boring and depressing. It's boring because it's an episode that connects the past and the next, and lacks a strong crisis for the protagonist to challenge. The depression is because it makes the Ministry of Magic stand directly on the opposite side of Hogwarts, and then temporarily builds a secondary line of confrontation between individuals and power outside the main line of Harry and Voldemort, but this secondary line is not only useless, but also Too naive and crude, completely irrespective of political logic, forcibly set up imaginary enemies, in order to create obstacles to the protagonist, but the result is that the whole movie is reduced to a second-degree comic. If the third narrative is the most detailed and rigorous, then this one is the most loose and empty. The biggest failure of the film is that Zhang Qiu has no charm, and the biggest highlight is Luna's slay audience.

Orland 2022-03-24 09:01:06

I have always had little interest in this series, but I am very fond of various supporting roles.