Sure enough, this film is a complete popcorn movie, in short, there is no interesting connotation at all.
As for how awesome the first-person perspective is, which is praised by many people, I think this is a big failure. Of course, this failure is based on a good movie, not a popcorn movie.
Why call it a failure? Because it's so easy to make people play.
Imagine if a first-person narration was suddenly inserted into a novel narrated in the third person. Wouldn't it be abrupt?
Of course, I'm not saying this is impossible, on the contrary, if you use it properly, it will produce an alternative aesthetic.
If it was a Guy Ritchie or a Quentin movie that did the trick, it might be interesting because people are meant to "play" movies. But this film is obviously not suitable for such an insertion, because you are making a movie.
What are you playing with movies? Playing with structure, photography, editing, and style! It is full of experimentation itself, and the interesting thing about it is the unbridled splash of ink, which is as casual as cursive script.
What is filming about? is the rule! Just like regular script, you are sitting upright, you can't be out of line, you can't cross the axis.
The first-person perspective inserted in this film is equivalent to inserting Zhang Xu's cursive script in Wang Xizhi's "Orchid Pavilion", not to mention too awkward.
View more about The Amazing Spider-Man reviews
