If the previous movies were waves of movements to create gods, the current films are waves of movements of humanizing gods.
Since when did people stop believing in "God"?
The Western spiritual belief world conveys the concept of "original sin" through various movies every year, showing the image of the great and benevolent "God", trying to make the oriental people on the other side of the earth believe like them, that there is only one most merciful person in the world. Great God, the most beautiful place in the world is heaven, all people come to atone for their sins, and a person who is not careful to mourn until he dies, can only go to hell - everyone is like this, no exception.
Originally, I saw that more and more people on the street were talking about "MY GOD", just like the iPad, which is almost every hand now, and I couldn't help but admire how effective their work is.
And today, when I see the wave after wave of humanization movements, I can't help laughing: "History is always repeating itself."
We Chinese are people with broad minds and strong tolerance. Not only is it eclectic, but also has a strong assimilation ability-everything will change actively or passively when it arrives here-as long as you want to gain the same glory as the place of departure.
We insist: If you want people to understand your words, you have to speak human words.
So there is such a paradox: people who originally wanted to transform others have to transform themselves first, and then they can transform others. And the higher you want to climb, the more changes you will have.
And we Chinese are really a very enthusiastic nation. We always give applause to beautiful and outstanding things. So there are Taoism, Buddhism, Islam and Christianity in this land. A lively scene of flowers blooming.
What a sense of world harmony, it should be a good thing, right? It's just a pity, we believe that there is no text in the first place, but God is used to being the first, do you think you can get used to it? Do not know what God would say when communicating with Buddha? The Buddha can probably enlighten him, after all, the Buddha has experienced all this. Speaking of whether they will say: "This is a place without God." I guess the tone should be a little bit of hatred for iron and not steel, or a bit of loss, um, and some praise for the hardness as a mountain. Having said that, in fact, they still have the same concept as the Chinese. The Chinese say: "Writing has no priority, and military has no second." Fiery - if you can't do it in the text, you will come to the martial arts. Anyway, you have to listen to me! ! (The people from LM interpret the history of LM)
Far too far, pull back here. There is probably never a "god" here.
People here have always been down-to-earth "people". It is possible to follow the Buddha to cultivate the next life, and to follow the Taoist to cultivate the present life. But no matter what he cultivates, it is actually because of his belief that Tian Xingjian is a gentleman who constantly strives for self-improvement.
When God arrives here, he can only be the person he has always regarded as a lamb.
I don’t know if it’s because the gods have appeared in the human form for too long, and they start to miss the feeling of being a human being, so we have seen waves of human-like gods in their movie promotional videos?
In this film, I saw the quasi-hero who was at a loss in love, the same impulsive, self-righteous, and emotionally charged as all ordinary teenagers in the rebellious period. So I held popcorn, drank Coke, and watched how ridiculous and cute the hairy child was.
So, this is still a very suitable movie to watch when you don't want to use your brain. Well, couples should be included. It is said that people in love will have a lower IQ and a great sense of humor. Silly, silly, this movie fully satisfies this condition.
The screenwriter is very sincere to the final plot and there are still small ups and downs: the male protagonist first alienates the female protagonist, the female protagonist comes to the male protagonist wet and miserable, and the male protagonist says in pain and tangled: "I can't." The
female protagonist burst into tears turn around. A friend saw this and said, "She should know that he has difficulties." Before
I could speak, the heroine had already turned around and said her own guess - she really knew that he had difficulties.
In fact, I wanted to say at the time, "Knowing doesn't make her sad."
Of course, later the male lead went to the female lead again, and the ending was a comedy. This is a must for a lighthearted story.
As a digression, when I was young, I always seemed to think that if I didn't say anything, the other party should also understand. I always feel that the other party should be the person who knows him best. If he really doesn't understand, it's simply a sin. Not to mention that people are not gods who do not have a mind, or that this "should know best" is actually just one's own expectations. But always forget, always take expectations as reality.
Until now, well, it seems that I still won't say it. Seeing here is not really flat, huh, huh. Don't worry, the same performance is not necessarily the same reason. I used to think it was unnecessary, but now I think it's useless. Speaking of which, even if you know that the other party cannot always know your own thoughts, when the result will not change, you can borrow a line: all explanations are pale.
At this time, what is needed is not explanation, but comfort. From this point of view, the male protagonist is really good in the end - direct action - this should be the best consolation.
As for whether this "consolation" can have a good result, that is another matter - after all, there is an unexplained injury that has been foreshadowed in the front. But the male protagonist was lucky, and the female protagonist laughed - this is really a movie.
PS Of course, if you like satirical and humorous couples who use their brains for fun, they can probably watch "Batman: The Dark Knight" released at the same time. As for why, it will be discussed in another article.
And PS only know that the director is a literary director, no wonder the filming is so warm~
View more about The Amazing Spider-Man reviews
