The film depicts the twists and turns between Harry Potter and his godfather Sirius, who eventually get to know each other and become a family again, but the process is not easy. This Harry Potter movie contains many elements and is rich in content. Time control, Sirius, friendship between friends, werewolves, the budding of young love. . . And so on, but the main story line is how the evil Sirius in the eyes of people proves his innocence and wins the respect and love of Harry Potter. What strikes me here is how to prove your innocence, how to trust someone. How should the good and the bad, as well as the good and the evil, be distinguished? Where are their borders? Furthermore, are there boundaries between good and evil? How do we know whether a person is good or bad? Potter's parents, James and Lily, have mistaken friends and are betrayed by Peter Pettigrew, while loyal Sirius is wronged. The powerful magic world could not see such a fact, and only used Sirius, who was at the scene at the time, as a backing, which is undoubtedly a tragedy. But even more tragically, Sirius' former friends and even family members did not believe he was innocent. When he escaped from Azkaban, no one even accepted him, everyone regarded him as a huge threat. What power is it that makes people lose their judgment on basic good and evil? Buckbeak, the four-legged bird in the same movie, had a similar experience, because Malfoy's disrespect annoyed the arrogant bird and hurt Malfoy. But in Buckbeak's trial, no one cared about how the conflict started, and no one cared about the disrespectful treatment of the big bird, and everyone just listened to Malfoy's words and sentenced Buckbeak to death. What kind of human nature is reflected in these behaviors? Many tragic events in human history occurred in similar conditions, such as the Inquisition, the Crusades, and the conquest of witches. . . They are all doing evil deeds in the name of the so-called justice. This is the most primitive and evil heart of human beings, and the destructive power it brings. But how did such a conclusion come to be? Couldn't the people in those days see how dark this approach was? It is conceivable that they were obviously invisible or turned a blind eye back then. If most people realized or realized that this is evil, the world would not be like that. But why can't you see or don't want to see it? I think, not invisible, but strongly support! Yes, these things cannot be done without the support of the people. But why did people support it then? And the interesting thing is that now On the same thing, they objected again! What exactly is at work in the middle? Have people's consciences and values changed? Did genes also evolve over time? This may be a very funny question. Has the nature of human beings changed for thousands of years? I see no change. Human beings have only changed from consuming blood to using tools to cook better. The essence has not changed. They still have to eat meat and have not developed other ways to absorb energy. So is education useful? Did education work? I don't think so either! What education implements are the values that were popular at the time. If it happened in the era of the Crusaders, then education must also say that the great disaster brought about by heresy and the actions that need to be taken for it, otherwise there would be no Crusades. . From this point of view, what is the use of education? Modern education is the result of the capitalist division of labor, and has not changed the essence of human beings, which is self-interest. Yes, self-centred humans will always make the same mistakes, and sadly, it's a more ancient and timeless thing. And this characteristic naturally divides the crowd, and the one who holds the strong power will crusade other aspects that are inconsistent with itself, with various just reasons, and this just reason is evil in other aspects, then There's only one thing left to do-- conquest. In ancient society, conquests were physically eliminated. Modern society will pay more attention to people, because that is the source of productivity and should not be easily wasted. Therefore, with human rights, there are more perfect laws. It is said that human rights are protected. Above is to protect productivity. Either way, conquest is in the name of justice, but does it really have justice? Looking at the past, most are not, but the opposite of justice, evil! Hence the words "Old Society", "Dark Ages". So "justice" is "evil" or "evil" is "justice"? Sounds really funny. So, to sum up, "power is justice"! And where does power come from? It is from a group that has such beliefs. Their group is strong and armed, and they conquer everything around them. Going back to Harry Potter again, the unjust injustice suffered by Sirius comes from people's deep hatred and heartfelt fear of Voldemort. Everything related to Voldemort should be permanently sealed in a place where he can never show up again. So people don't care what it really looks like, as long as it's related to Voldemort, whether he is righteous or evil, as long as he doesn't judge it, then it's fine to disappear! Even his friends were the opposite, people were terrified by Voldemort! This is the power of the so-called "justice", and "power is justice"! For Buckbeak, for Voldemort, and even for Dumbledore, it can be seen that whether "just" or "evil", their foundation is "fear". In fact, there can be true "peace" without "fear". Therefore, "evil" and "justice" have no boundaries, they are one and the same thing, two sides of the same "fear".
View more about Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban reviews
