On Saturday, I got half-price tickets at the last minute of the morning show and went in to watch Star Trek.
Let’s talk about the name first, star trek, I always feel that it is more appropriate to translate it into interstellar hard travel, but hard travel reminds me of Master Yu, and suddenly there is a scene of astronauts selling chrysanthemums with tears in their eyes, so I feel that Trek is more There is atmosphere.
It is said that Star Trek was born in 1979, the same age as Star Wars, but it is far behind the latter in computer technology, so it has been suppressed for many years. These details are also fragmentary information on the Internet. I don’t know if they can be taken seriously, but the biggest significance of this information to me is that it completely extinguished my desire to watch the first few Star Trek movies. I don’t reject old movies, but they use high technology as a gimmick. I can't identify with the old film of the old movie. I still remember the majestic appearance of Han Solo sitting in the position of the machine gunner in Star Wars and chasing the alien battleship with a machine gun...
According to my guess, because the early computer technology did not It is developed, so all the characters need to be played by people, so the aliens, both positive and negative, appear in the shape of people in early sci-fi movies. After the technology is developed enough, films like the Black Super Special Police of the Galaxy Fleet can show the aliens in the shape of bugs and even octopuses to the audience.
But in the early Star Trek, it was obvious that the Romulans represented by the Kenny or the villain boss Nino were full of humanoids. The advantage of this is that it is easy to act, but the disadvantage is that the taste of science fiction is greatly weakened, and it feels like it is still cowboys and Indians. Same as fighting. Similarly, there is no need to wear an oxygen mask on Vega, and Nino's spaceship is also filled with oxygen. It is convenient for shooting, but it weakens my sense of identification with science fiction.
So for science fiction films that appear aliens in the form of humans, I would be a little bit repulsive at first.
For these reasons, the impact of this film on me is not the impact a sci-fi film should give me. When watching a movie, a lot of strange titles such as "Fast and Furious" and "Deadly Pleasure" always pop up in my mind. ”, “Titan of the Sky” and so on, when the Russian boy opened his mouth, I immediately jumped to the Russian cosmonaut of “Doomsday” - Abruzzi in prison escape... Sulu shines a knife... My God, My brain is about to explode.
Sometimes I think that the development of film technology is actually pushing against each other's originality, and it is difficult to maintain originality in the action scenes of a film. But I am not criticizing. In "God of Cookery", the judges said, like swimming and running, it's not that you do what others do, so there is nothing to protest. In fact, Bolt runs, I also run, Phillips swims and I also swim... Some elements are always the same in some movies, but the novelty or the good combination is another matter.
The action scenes are really good, with racing, fighting, gunfights, and even parachuting, and the connection is also good, but in fact, it does not reflect the novelty that a science fiction film can inject into an action film. (How this sentence sounds like the tone of a film critic who can't die!)
The sci-fi part uses a series of concepts of parallel universe black holes, but since Nino asked how many years this is the ephemeris, I guessed that he came from In the future, the next step is to go back to the past and save the past. As far as I am concerned, there are not many new ideas. The only thing that makes me feel a little different is that the changed past of the parallel universe-like future has changed the future of the current universe, but the original future has not changed my current present. That is, the future cannot modify its own future by going back to the past, because the one-way nature of wormholes makes this film contrary to the linear practical theories of Back to the Future and the Butterfly Effect - as if Nicholas Even if Nuo kills Spark, it doesn't necessarily prevent the destruction of his hometown in his parallel universe. Why not? Because he cannot return to the time axis of the book itself. What he did was to modify James Coulter's life, making Cotter, whose father was alive in another parallel universe, into a rebellious teenager, but he couldn't let himself modify the fact that his hometown was destroyed, because he didn't actually The way to return to my own parallel universe to witness the existence of my hometown greatly increases the tragic character of the characters, and makes me hate Martin and Evan who can travel through time at will, look at Nino! What is fearless, selfless and helpless!
----------------------- The above is the foreword, the following is the text------------------- ---
Until Simon Pegg's appearance, I was in a state of being indispensable to this film, until his appearance made my eyes shine. It doesn't matter if he acts well or not, what matters is his participation! It really doesn't make sense to like an actor. From now on, I am also a Star Trek fan, and I am firmly waiting for the next Star Trek to be released!
Another: The camera in "HOUSE", the colossus of James Coulter's mother, came back and googled but couldn't find it. It seems that my old eyes are dizzy.
View more about Star Trek reviews
