The movie "Escape from Tehran" was changed from a real story. Although the plot was rendered, the key links and ending were not fabricated. This is a due rule, and this film did it.
When Tony went to Iran on a mission, according to the plot inference, he seemed to say goodbye to his son - he took off the ring and put it in front of his son's photo. According to habitual thinking, it is possible that the hostage was saved, and he could not come back, because sacrifice and heroes often go hand in hand, there is no bloody smell, and it is not heroic.
The film tells me that the protagonist Tony is a hero, the Canadian ambassador is also a hero, and the nanny of the ambassador's house is also a hero.
The plot is thrilling, and there are always some scenes and words that can leave people with some special impressions and thoughts. I believe that with something like this, the film is close to success.
Scene 1: When the flight attendant announced that the plane had left Iran's airspace, the six rescued people were full of joy and rebirth. I couldn't wait for Tony's shot at that time - he was still so calm, he didn't even feel relieved , but the eyes seem to be crystal clear. Only after that did the rescued people come to him to thank him. Even though I knew this was the best expression of human nature, I still gave them morality in my heart. Of course, secret work is a special profession, and the medals he has already won can't be shown to his son. What else can he complain about?
Scene 2: "I've never given up on the rescuers" - Tony's words for the rescued people who don't trust and don't cooperate should not be hard, but they are loud and clear. This kind of determination not to give up has an indescribable power. It is generally believed that you do not want to walk away. Tony didn't, he just seriously stated his true situation and changed his mind.
''There's always someone in charge'' - that's what Tonyd said when he took the call from his boss telling him to end the action plan. ''I'm in charge'', hang up. Disobeying orders and putting yourself in the uncertainty of life and death - here is rationality, human nature, responsibility, and responsibility. I don't know what member D he is, but I know he is a man of flesh and blood, a hero with courage and wisdom, and he is not advertised as the defending god of gods!
The fusion and conflict of civilizations are always inseparable from the entanglement of interests. In an emergency, the efforts of Canada and its ambassadors can be called ''a model of international cooperation'' - this positioning and evaluation, I personally think is very appropriate. Here, only talking about interests is certainly narrow. If you look at the border between Canada and the United States, you probably know that something is also important—that is, shared perception.
Politics, civilization, interests, populism, human nature, etc., are entangled in the film, nothing is "present", and nothing is particularly "prominent". Exactly like this, it is invaluable to interpret it into a thrilling and complete drama.
View more about Argo reviews
