At 0:30 in the morning, when the movie was over, I started to ask myself, is this what I have been waiting for for more than ten years? I found myself again overestimating the level of the director. Although the film is claimed to be produced by Spielberg, I really suspect that his old man is just a friendly title. Except for the so-called chao xi, most of the plots can only recall the endless, unsuspenseful chase routines and fight scenes of Jupiter 3. However, the appearance of the moss dragon is indeed a highlight. As the ocean overlord at the end of the Cretaceous period, Neptune (Mosasaurus), relying on its huge body and ferocious nature, really caused an extremely shocking visual impact to the audience inside and outside the screen. Although it is difficult to make up for the shortcomings of the overall plot, it is indeed a good attempt in terms of conception.
Judging from the performance of the actors, in addition to Xingjue's good performances, the other actors' contrived elements are a bit too obvious. Generally speaking, it is the word "death". I won't go into the specific details, I believe you can already deeply understand it.
In addition, talk about your ranking of the Jurassic Park tetralogy, from high to low: the first, the second, the fourth and the third. In addition to the simple plot of the third part, the special effects are also average, and it is said that the film has already started, and the script has not yet been written. Finally, let me say that I really don't want the Jurassic series to go from being a classic to a nondescript crappy like the Biochemical series. Dinosaurs are dinosaurs, they are ancient behemoths that actually existed on earth. We love real dinosaurs, not monsters, not hybrids. why? I might paraphrase a quote from Star-Lord: "Why would we remake them? Dinosaurs are fascinating enough."
View more about Jurassic World reviews
