1: Recognized the Godfather, recognized the machete, recognized Ma Hong, recognized the Batman Kilmer who I think had the most perfect chin, and then looked at the familiar mole and the familiar face... this Nima is De Niro? 2: Just like "Once Upon a Time in America" and "Schindler's List", I keep a movie that I haven't watched for many years. I always feel that this kind of classic in my heart is a perfect movie to watch when I don't know it. 3: I especially like this kind of movie with a written style, but because the actors are so good, they control it perfectly and provide a novel version of the movie. As a post-80s generation, I have no resistance to this kind of script, so I will say it again. Very committed. 4: The first shock the film gave me was the explosion of the car doors and other adjacent cars during the robbery. There was a very real time difference. Today, with the proliferation of special effects, I really miss and admire the intentions of the original film. The degree is just a shot that blows up the car door, and a small 45-degree panorama is carefully designed to show it. 5: Compared with De Niro's calmness and restraint, Al Pacino is much more perverse. This contrast is The characteristics of the actors themselves, of course, the two have enough ability to play a perverse criminal and a calm policeman, but in my experience, they are far less exciting and playful than the first role positioning. The tension, and then the finale, the panoramic back view of De Niro's hand pulled by Al Pacino also made me imagine that if this movie were set in the Middle Ages, would the ending be completely different, and why? 6: The 170-minute movie made me feel very long, because the first story was told in detail, and second, the feedback of the aerial scenes and montages gave me a special footing. Combined with the interpretation of the characters, I was forced to see something. It's an epic feeling. I don't know if it was the same period or the later stage of the bank shootout. Every loud gunshot made my hair stand upright. I calculated that the police and bandits who shot in the head did not add up to more than 20 people, but the actual experience Woolen cloth? The density of the gunshots and the scattered crowd made this scene the most powerful and full of impact. 7 The last is the understanding of home free at the end. The first is to follow the style of text-based dialogue, home free, if you look for it again Which movie has said that, is the thief literary and artistic, and it was said from De Niro's mouth, there is no sense of disobedience at all, if it is replaced by Al Pacino, it is estimated to be it' s fxxx over and the like, and at the same time, the sentence home free reinterprets the artistry of the film. The last handshake of the elegant thief and the evil detective is that he does not regret the choice to face the way of life. You can ductively figure out the first place at the dining table for the two of you. A conversation and a final handshake, Al Pacino, who took the initiative to confide in his heart, and De Niro, who never gave in, have one thing in common. They both said something that I wouldn't do other than my current job. Interesting. Here comes the policeman played by Al Pacino, after completing this case and relying on solving the case for the pleasure of life, will he satisfy the dull life after this climax? Finally, thanks to Mann for making a true crime movie!
View more about Heat reviews
