"Sure enough, if you read horror novels, you still need to look for old history!" While recollecting the plot inside, brewing coffee.
Stephen. Jin is not the foreign novelist I first knew. To be precise, I should be from this. Teli's novels began to look. (I don’t comment on this British master of horror fiction.) Later I read Stephen. After Jin's novel. Never touched Ben again. Teli's book.
Back to this movie, how do you say it? Even two days ago, I didn't know that one of my favorite novels had been put on the screen. == Well, I admit that my news is not well understood!
Before I saw it, I knew I would compare it with the original. Sure enough, as expected. But I think I am more objective when it comes to the remake. It's just that sometimes I can't help but struggle. ==
The fluency of the whole movie is good. But visually, it might be a little conservative. (After all, it is a work in the 1980s.) For example, the story of the hero's son crawling out of the cemetery and returning home. It has been mentioned in the novel that his son has been buried for a while before the male lead dug him out and buried him in the pet cemetery. Therefore, the child's face was already covered with moss and began to rot. But it was not shown in the movie. When I saw the clean and ruddy little guy crawling out of the cemetery, I was really embarrassed.
Haha~~~~~ There is a bone in the egg!
The movie was good. It's worth taking a look.
View more about Pet Sematary reviews