By the end of The Bourne 3, I really felt a lot more than ever, especially the last shot, two shots to be sure - the female agent's smile and Bourne's sudden swimming in the water . The former, I interpret as implying that she knew that Byrne was not dead, maybe she was the one who saved him; the latter, it was obvious that Byrne was not dead. As soon as I have this kind of thought, my whole body is boiling, like seeing the dawn of the dawn, and I feel that thousands of audiences are looking forward to it. almost cried.
After reading these three parts, in fact, when I watched the third part, I found that every part of the "Bourne Bourne" series followed an old routine. That is, there must be a memory of Bourne throughout, leading the development of the plot. In terms of characters, there must be a CIA executive in charge of the overall situation, and unfortunately, they are all villains; the essential scenes are, the commander in the command post dispatches on the spot, Bourne searches for clues across the country, and then crackles and beats the CIA dispatched 's agent. There must be no less chase scenes, no less car chase scenes, and no less anti-reconnaissance scenes. Best of all, as soon as the music at the end hits, you know you're watching Bourne, not any other spy movie. Even so, with the same template, you can still see the director's skills, and you can still play new tricks in photography, script, and editing. At the same time, it also ensures the consistency and integrity of the trilogy.
Back to the third part. With the foreshadowing of the first two films, the audience has a more three-dimensional understanding of Bourne's image, and will admire his skills and sympathize with his experience. After seeing the ending, I felt more sympathy for Bourne's experience. An ordinary person, brainwashed by someone who abuses his power, becomes a "killing machine", does not know his true identity, and suffers from various memory sequelae. Those who approved the "Black Rose" plan also used the excuse of "protecting national interests and safeguarding national security" to justify themselves. This can't help but remind me of the "Prism Gate Incident", I heard that the background of the fifth part is this. Some time ago, the FBI asked Apple to unlock the phone of a suspected terrorist, but Apple did not agree. We have no way of knowing how big the government's rights are, but if it harms citizens, violates citizens' rights, and violates morality, there will naturally be fighters who will stand up and fight for it.
View more about The Bourne Ultimatum reviews