So of course everyone can't understand it, and those who pretend to understand if they don't understand, will come up with labels one by one, trying to scare others, "Idiots can't see this dress", such as our high praise short comments" You must understand Nietzsche first." Not to mention how many people in the world understand Nietzsche, the only relationship between this film and Nietzsche is that it used "Thus Said Zarathustra" as the soundtrack. People who like this short comment, I guess it was mostly frightened, and comforted myself, "No wonder I can't understand it, it's because of Nietzsche."
Some people say that this is a work from the 1960s, which is already very cool. I don’t think this point of view is valid. Good science fiction works span the ages. If 50 years have passed, all your science fiction ideas are no longer novel. At this time, the work has lost its charm. You say, “Fifty years ago, there was nothing What, so it's still very awesome", then I think this work is probably constrained by the times. For example, in Verne's science fiction works, almost all the fantasies have already been realized, but the works still have the charm that they transcend the times and are still readable. This is a good science fiction work.
As for those who associate this work with philosophy, they just like to equate the connotation with philosophy. The film does have a lot of hidden connotations. Blackstone can interpret countless symbolic meanings, but it is only a reflection of the novel and blank space. It's just a trick, just a strange light in the fish's eyes.
View more about 2001: A Space Odyssey reviews
