Not a star is because of Cage's face

Brown 2022-01-01 08:02:38

Heretics, let me first say that in the 06 version

, I saw Cage flying to save people or something. I thought it was an action movie.

Then I saw Cage saying that the people in the car disappeared. I thought it was a suspense movie (excited). Get up)

Then I saw that Cage suddenly accepted an inexplicable quest to help his ex-fiancée from an inexplicable NPC. I thought it was a romantic movie

and then Cage arrived on a magical island with a great atmosphere of Jin Tianyi. , There are a lot of mysterious people, I thought it was a reasoning film (get excited again)

and then classmate Cage began to have hallucinations and habitually inject medicine, I thought it was a film related to psychology (emerged in my mind "Fatal ID", the director, don’t play with me anymore.)

Then Kaiqi has overcome all difficulties to find her daughter. I once again thought it was a romantic movie. Besides, I think Kaiqi didn’t show off his skills and just pretended to be a bear. Jump down?

At the end... I was suddenly shocked, why can't the plot catch up at all?
Isn’t the clues in front not foreshadowing, not hiding the plot, not psychological hints, but just the director’s cold in a certain corner?
Isn't it because the investors won't give money when you shoot here, so you have to shoot the end hastily before you explain so many things?
Is everything my own passion, the whole plot is so simple, so NC so many loopholes?

Is the whole story about a kind of magical feudal superstition (called religious belief abroad, I know), so many people join together to deceive a FOOL to burn the sacrifice? Designed with so many plots and so many leads, at the expense of beauty and temptation, and no hesitate to plan for many years, even if you want a blood relationship, wouldn’t it be enough to put him down at the beginning of going to the island? They really do this too much...

Aside from the loopholes in the plot (too many to talk about), the unclear theme of the film is also a major drawback. If the director wants to show a bee-like island from the perspective of an onlooker, a wonderful female kingdom, this idea is not bad, but the director’s classmates obviously didn’t learn biology well: in the bee colony, drones really only have reproductive functions. But they never do any work except for mating-they are not lowly slaves. Of course, they have to die after mating, because they can't make a living, and the bee colony will not raise him for nothing, but they never think that "the drone must die", and this peculiar belief has no source or evidence.

Well, we can say that this is completely fabricated, and there is no need to have a realistic basis. This is to be avoided. He wanted to show a religion, but it was undoubtedly a failure. All we saw were inexplicable pictures. We still don't know what this religion is, or the motivation behind each character's language and behavior.



If the director just wanted to surprise us, and deliberately arranged a magical ending to surprise us, then it did. I am really surprised, but it's not a stunning surprise, it's a shocking surprise.
I'm afraid it's hard to say that this dog is a sable, nor is it a sable. I personally think this is a very good ending. The previous part is not useless, but when these two parts are connected together, it produces a frightening effect-I still feel that I have watched a traditional Holly Tungsten hero rescue. Most of the beautiful HAPPYENDING film, but I didn't see the end; I watched the ending of a classic CULT film, but I don't know anything about the previous plot. When I say this, you should be able to understand how much I feel that this ending is out of touch.

In addition, the various bizarre events on the island, afterwards, I felt completely horrified for horror, meaningless. To put it bluntly, it was murdering the film to create excitement.
Can you tell me what these scenarios mean?
You said: "Why does it have to mean anything?"
If it doesn't mean anything, what do you do with it?

Time in movies is precious, and murder film is equal to murder film.

This film provided me with a very awkward viewing experience. I felt confusing and confusing for more than an hour. Although the quality deteriorated more towards the back, it was relatively mild. At the end, there was a steep downhill of almost 90 degrees. In one word, since then, this film has been ranked as the first of the bad movies of Cage classmates I have watched-as long as Cage doesn't take the drama randomly, it is estimated that its status will be unshakable for a period of time.

The 73 version of the original work, after browsing it, I feel that it is completely two movies with the remake, and I haven’t found the subtitles yet.

View more about The Wicker Man reviews

Extended Reading

The Wicker Man quotes

  • Sister Rose: Mr. Malus, no one is lying to you. I told you that if Rowan Woodward existed, we would know of her.

    Edward Malus: If she existed? If?

    Sister Rose: But you cannot come barging into our...

    Edward Malus: I just saw that she existed with my own two eyes. And I suppose her mother is lying to me, too, huh? She's lying?

    Sister Rose: Not lying, no. Grieving. We all are.

    Edward Malus: Wait, wait, wait, wait. When you say that she's grieving, you mean that Rowan is... dead?

    Sister Rose: You would say so, yes.

    Edward Malus: She's dead or she isn't.

    Sister Rose: We never use that word here.

    Edward Malus: [sarcastic] No, that'd be too quixotic.

    Sister Rose: Yes.

  • Sister Rose: [Malus interrupts her school lesson] I was unaware any of my girls needed arresting.

    Edward Malus: They don't, no. I'm just up here to find a missing girl whom people are pretending doesn't exist.

    Sister Rose: How quixotic of you.

    Edward Malus: Quixotic?

    Sister Rose: From "Don Quixote"; pursuer of lofty but impractical ideals.